Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-06 03:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2196 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2196 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - empty image with a text comment ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
That is not a culture no matter how much some nerds desperately want it to be.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Star Wars is culture. Like it or not, it's famous. Gone with the Wind is culture.
Firefly, though I do love it, is at best a cult hit that is relatively unknown and not all that popular.
Nobody is going to open a history book 30 years from now and see "I'll be in my bunk" talked about. This is not necessary cultural research and suggesting to OP otherwise is arrogance at best.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)COULD IT BE WE ARE SEEING THE REAL INSANENOODLEGUY?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-06 23:24 (UTC) - ExpandIt's usually pretty easy to figure out when it's really me actually
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 12:48 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-07 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-07 01:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-07 01:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-07 01:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 09:39 am (UTC)(link)Not on the internet it isn't.
For frame of reference, how many times have you heard any line from GWTW quoted online? Even the highly quotable famous line?
Even offline, compare the number of times you heard any refernce to GWTW spoken of typed anywhere to the number of times you've heard the 'I'll be in my bunk' online.
I'd also argue that Starwars is pop culture and is of no greater significance culturally than any other highly quoted geek phenominon but you've either got a bee in you're bonnet about this, or you're arguing for the sake of it, and I have no time for either of those today.
Ooo, one last thing, How do you know what's going to be quoted on 30 years time? People (well not people, studio execs) didn't think 'That's no moon' would still be being referenced in 40 years time. Time will tell.
no subject
no subject
you don't need to do serious research into the 19th century fad for incorrectly spelled acronyms to be allowed to use the word "OK"
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)This is not about some elitist OMFG CULTURAL EDUCATION thing. This is about knowing what people in certain subcultures talk about, which you might want to if you're part of that subculture.
no subject
Hell, we have secrets on here about how people do that sort of shit for things they actually claim to be in the fandom of. The difference here being OP isn't a firefly fan and doesn't claim to be one, just a scifi fan. In which case some cursory research if they are really curious is all that's necessary.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 02:36 am (UTC)(link)So, no. They really don't have to watch it for the sake of a few memes.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 09:45 am (UTC)(link)It's my tastes that determine what I watch, not some kind of invisible popculture checklist
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 12:40 am (UTC)(link)You're just angling in another way to "OMG you gotta watch it all before you're allowed an opinion on my precious."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 02:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 03:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
GOOD FOR YOU
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 12:53 am (UTC)(link)There are a lot of serious sci-fi fans who consider Firefly to be mediocre at best and barely worthy of mention. Seriously, it is not well-regarded and, in some circles, it's social suicide to admit that you like it.
The idea that it's a "classic" is absolutely ridiculous and mostly a product of Joss Whedon worship than anything else. And I'm saying this as someone who actually enjoyed it.
no subject
no subject
But it'd make more sense to read that then it would be to watch all of firefly if we talk purely about "culture education"
no subject
Why? Same reasons Dark Shadows is more important culturally than That Really Thought Provoking Horror Novel You Read Once. Firefly was just never popular enough. Twilight spawned a new genre of young adult fiction and has had a possible impact on the sexuality of a hell of a lot of young women. Hell, it spawned 50 Shades.
If the OP is writing some kind of paper on early 2000s online fandoms then they should be familiar with Firefly. Otherwise a shortlived tv show that was cancelled a decade ago only requires a wikipedia article and maybe some youtube clips.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 06:24 am (UTC)(link)Um, no? Paranormal teen romance has existed long before Twilight entered the scene. That's like saying The Hunger Games spawned a futuristic dystopian genre for young adult fiction. All they do is making the genre popular again.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 06:10 (UTC) - Expandno subject