Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-07 06:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #2197 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2197 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)I had issues with RTD too but I think he'd have more respect for the past characters which is a 50th I'd rather see.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 00:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 02:58 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 05:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 15:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 17:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 22:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 02:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 02:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Or something like that? I might have dreamt this? Or it might have been some kind of joke/gif. from Tumblr. or something.
But if that is true, they might have just told everyone to say they wont be in it? BBC can be quite good at keeping Doctor Who things secret when they want them to be.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
But I don't want Moffat coming anywhere near something like that. I actually feel relief when someone says they're not going to be involved.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 02:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 01:47 am (UTC)(link)I honest-to-god have no idea what to expect from Moffat. This is a man who can write "The Big Bang", which no matter your opinion of the episode's overall quality, is one of the most pitch-perfect, heartwarming, unapologetically sincere and loving celebrations of the power of fiction and memories and childhood and dreams and imagination and stories - and of Doctor Who's meta and mythology in particular - I've ever witnessed in my life, and then proceed to shit all over those themes repeatedly and, worse, obliviously for the entire season following it (at least RTD's constant face-palming tinkerbell jesus-y stuff and ill-conceived mean-spirited character arcs for season 4 and the specials seemed self-aware).
So what he comes out with might somehow be wonderful because I know he's capable of it, but may quite likely be complete pointless nonsense.
Sometimes I half-suspect Moffat's wonderful adoring respectful resonant keen-sighted ideas are stuff that he accidentally scrawls while drunk/high and doesn't actually understand. Or maybe he's been possessed by those Carrionites from The Shakespeare Code. I just can't wrap my mind around it.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 03:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 03:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(in any case, I'm kinda hoping Moffat will do something small and silly in the vein of a Curse of Fatal Death redux, because I don't trust anyone to do a Big Damn Epic All-Encompassing Anniversary Spectacular that wouldn't feel either anticlimactic, incoherent, or leave half the viewership angered and dissatisfied)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 04:04 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 04:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
If they are involved in the 50th somehow, then they'll be working under Moffat, who is a trollface lying liar who lies, and the BBC, who are desperate to keep it all under wraps until the official announcement... and thus will probably say they're still waiting for the phone call.
There is no information to be gleaned from these sorts of interviews, except that David Tennant is a terrible liar and we all know he's in up to his arse-cheeks.
(Right now I'd give you ten-to-one odds that Moffat is bringing people back for the 50th. He's a fanboy. It's an ironclad tradition. He'll probably be trying to outdo Zagreus for sheer over-the-top multi-Doctor WTFery. Most of the time he's painfully aware that he's writing for a non-fanboy audience, but this is his big chance to geek out.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-08 19:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 11:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-08 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-09 00:53 (UTC) - Expand