Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-26 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #2216 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)Although, saying that, even if you do think it's bad, it's still not as bad as Terry Goodkind. Nothing is.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 05:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Strangely enough, no longer being 14 has done wonders for my appreciation for how nuanced his grasp of female characters are, especially the adults. They're characters with motivations and politics and allegiances of their own first, and women second. Not because they aren't women, but because what they do is more important than what gender they are. Which is kind of what equality is about, theoretically?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 05:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Dude can't into physiology? I get that that's a common myth - like the people who think women have more ribs, or fewer teeth - but it could be dispelled with even the slightest amount of research. And it wasn't like he was trying to portray the character as believing a myth, either - the character was correct, and was portrayed as being very clever and observant.
I don't even know, dude. But then again Aristotle himself couldn't be assed to look into a woman's mouth and just blindly believed the teeth thing, too. And I mean, those are demonstrable untruths. For the Mars/Venus sociological stuff, there's all kinds of dumb horseshit people believe are just factual differences between the sexes.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 01:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 07:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 12:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-28 06:35 am (UTC)(link)(I've been on an Anne McCaffrey kick lately, and while that woman's writing and worlds will always be an influence on me, there's still the 'older and dearly beloved relative you've given up hoping they'll ever know any better' element with her.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)Any reviews? Especially on the misogyny part.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)This is a pretty good repository of quotes that points out certain elements of the series that are not so good: http://sandstormreviews.blogspot.com/2006/08/goodkind-parodies.html
There's spoilers, but, I mean, seriously. Don't miss the evil chicken and the peace protestors.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 00:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
How do you feel about Objectivism?
If your answer isn't FUCK YEAH I LOVE THOSE THINGS!!!!.... DO NOT READ HIS BOOKS.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 21:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 22:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 22:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 22:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 23:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 23:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 05:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Good decision, apparently.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)It's like half the internet is saying that it's sexist to only like warrior type of female character. That not all women have to be physically badass to be strong and interesting. Then, when there are other types (mothers, spies, princessess and so on), you can't like them either because they're ~so stereotypically feminine~.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 22:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 22:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 04:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 05:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 06:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-30 04:47 (UTC) - ExpandFor a change
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)It is heartbreaking it isn't as well known as the examples up there. Trouble is the series came out just after the 80s fantasy boom died and before the post-potter fantasy boomed started so it gets all ignored.
Re: For a change
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 23:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: For a change
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-26 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: For a change
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)However, by the end of the series, the main female characters had blossomed into amazing people. In particular, I would like to put forth the example of Egwene, who became my favorite character and who kicked all kinds of motherfucking ass in the last three books (grant you, those were written by a different author. However, they were crafted after the notes and outlines that Jordan left behind). She knew that she was being manipulated, so she manipulated her manipulators right the fuck back, and transformed herself from a puppet to an actual authority through strength and cunning and sheer force of will. She stood firm for what she believed in; she spat in the eye of those who would hold her down and bested them. She saved the White Tower, and had she turned the tide of battle on the Fields of Merrilor. She alone elevates WoT, as far as I am concerned.
As for the other series...the one book of Eddings that I read did not catch my interest to where I felt like reading any of his other words, and while I've not read Goodkind, what I've heard about his works makes me want to keep far away. So, uh...yeah.
no subject
On the other hand, I do really like David Eddings. Admittedly, he's been writing the same characters over and over again with different backgrounds, but the banter in his books is just awesome.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 01:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
TIME TO GUSH ABOUT THE WOMENS
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 15:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TIME TO GUSH ABOUT THE WOMENS
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 05:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 11:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 06:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 15:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-28 22:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 15:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Image won't load
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Transcript
Re: Transcript
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 11:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Transcript
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 01:40 am (UTC)(link)But he had me at evil chicken.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 06:31 am (UTC)(link)Go read Terry Pratchett's stuff if you want good fantasy.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-27 11:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-30 04:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Of course there's a good few other faults to Eddings' writing besides that. It still has a great deal of sentimental value to me, because The Diamond Throne was like, the 4th serious novel I ever read (two of the books before it were a duology, and the first one was the same author as the duology), and was a big influence in my becoming an obsessive reader.
That obsessive reading is what got me into online fandom (fanfic, I loves it).