Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-26 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2336 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2336 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11. [posted twice]
__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-27 06:36 am (UTC)(link)Pretty sure I read this is a debunked popular myth in a science magazine recently.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)This study sounds very dumb.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandWomen have been studied
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:10 (UTC) - ExpandWomen w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Women w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian
Re: Women w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-29 01:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)not that i object to imagining cumberbatch has a big dick
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-28 05:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)(On a serious note, I do have PCOS, which as far as I know is linked to higher than average levels of some hormones like testosterone. Interesting, huh.)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 20:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:09 (UTC) - ExpandWomen w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Women w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 12:26 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:49 (UTC) - ExpandHow do you know
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: How do you know
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 21:18 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandThe way I read it
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The way I read it
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:32 (UTC) - Expandif we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)Even allowing for the fact that it was an air-conditioned theater, and he was playing before a full house, I still can only site another review's wording: "baby carrot."
http://lostlookingforfish.blogspot.ca/2011/02/unencumberbatched.html
Re: if we are talking about BC's package.....
Re: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 21:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
Re: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: if we are talking about BC's package.....
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 19:26 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)I do have a huge thing for hands though, so the pics were nice. There is something about the grace them that captivates me. I don't consider it a sexual thing, I just admire people who have nice hands.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 21:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:14 (UTC) - ExpandLarger penis size
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)That said, I remember the study you're referring to, and I'm pretty sure it was never accepted by the actual scientific field.
THIS!
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
But hey, it's your fantasy.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)The citation is right there in the post you dumb fucks, look up the study and feel free to submit your well-researched counterargument to the journal
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 11:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 11:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 23:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 02:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 06:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 00:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 01:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 02:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 22:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 08:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-27 12:07 am (UTC)(link)The study in question
(Anonymous) 2013-05-27 12:14 am (UTC)(link)The study linked:
144 men, all Korean, so it's hardly a diverse or random sample. Then, look at table 3, and look at those r values. The ring finger vs index finger measurements that OP is talking about are in the "digit ratio" column. R values come between 1 and -1, and those values are about -0.2 for both flaccid and stretched penis length. That's hardly a significant correlation by any statistics standard, regardless of what conclusions the scientists draw at the end. All the p value says is they're reasonably certain that their correlation coefficient is right.
Also, quoted directly from the study itself:
"Among these three variables (height, BMI and digit ratio), only height was a significant predictive factor for flaccid penile length (r=0.172, P=0.038) in the multivariate analysis using a linear regression model."
Considering OP is seeing flaccid penises here, the study says exactly the opposite of what they think it does; height matters more.
If you need more proof, look at figure 1. The line plotted is their line assuming a correlation, and the points plotted are the actual data. It's clear there's no major correlation.
Re: The study in question
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-27 04:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-27 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I love youNerd Alert
(Anonymous) 2013-05-27 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)I adore you so very much for including the citation with the secret. It warms my researcher heart!
no subject