Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-06-22 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2363 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2363 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 01:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 03:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 08:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 16:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 12:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 20:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 21:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 18:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
MoSWoK was an interesting thought experiment, but has less than nothing to do with the actual character of Superman.
It's seriously tainted my enjoyment of his other work - which is unfair, since it's mostly people who've read MoSWoK, and apparently never read a Superman comic book in their lives, who annoy me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)Sorry if I'm not making sense here.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Laurel Kent (before being retconned into a Manhunter android) was their descendant (edit - who looked EXACTLY like Lois, and had powers derived from Superman's, so adoption can't be used to explain her). The current Superboy is a clone of their son from an alternate reality. In the long-running Elseworlds series Superman/Batman: Generations, they had two kids, Joel and Lara. In the recurring Silver Age Imaginary Stories about the Super-Sons (Superman jr and Batman jr), Superman jr's mother, while never having her identity revealed (so she could be Lana or Lois, or someone else entirely), was shown as a perfectly ordinary human woman.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Like, if you do the reflex test on Superman, it works... exactly the same as it dos with a human. His leg kicks out subtly with very little force and you'd be perfectly safe if it touched you.
Same for his orgasms. He cums, he twithces, and it's exactly the same. Couldn't even in in a distance contest.
But okay. Science answer! He's got a red-sun radiation lamp he keeps just for this sort of thing.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 21:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 04:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)I'm more concerned that in that pic Lois has a reflection, but superman doesn't. Oh god, supercharged with sunlight, no reflection, penetrating eyes, can hang around in your bedroom without your knowledge....Superman is a TwiPire.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 21:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)<3 Superman/Lois
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 22:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
If Superman can take a shit without breaking the toilet, he can have sex without killing a human.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-22 22:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 03:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 12:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)Obviously he uses the pull out technique right before he comes. He quickly zooms off to a safe distance and spurts, his sperm having time to cool down from their heated jizz speed and fly dainty into Lois's vag.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
My husband refuses to ship Superman/Lois Lane because he thinks she would get obliterated during sex.
Secret because I'm not in the Superman fandom and now he's got me thinking about how these two would pull it off.
Notes
Re: Notes
Re: Notes
no subject
Examples (I only have these in Spanish, sadly)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 17:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)Recommendations? (I'm sure stuff like this is readily available.)
Totally OT
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 12:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Totally OT
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Totally OT
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 00:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Totally OT
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 12:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-06-23 06:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
i can't believe nobody said this
(...seriously tho' the solution to this problem can be had for the cost of a few 850 lumen lightbulbs, I don't get the, you know, issues here...)