[ SECRET POST #2479 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2479 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You are the first person I've ever seen use the term "USian" instead of American.

[(Anonymous)]

You've really never seen that?

It's hardly a unique thing.

[(Anonymous)]

DA. I've never seen it before either.

[(Anonymous)]

I realize it works in other languages but in English it sounds pretty weird!

[(Anonymous)]

It does sound pretty weird, but it's hard to think of a really elegant solution to the problem it's attempting to solve.

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe it's because in the USA 'American' refers specifically to someone in the USA, and when talking about the American continents we generally use 'North America', 'Central America', and 'South America' to differentiate. I suppose it's just a cultural difference that doesn't translate well, maybe...

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Sorry, I didn't mean to drag this out. I just think it's an interesting phenomena.

[(Anonymous)]

But there is actually no problem. Canadians don't call themselves Americans, though they are North Americans. Mexicans don't call themselves Americans, though they are North Americans. Hondurans don't call themselves Americans, though they are Central Americans (they are even North Americans, if you want to get technical). Brazilians don't call themselves Americans, though they are South Americans. Colombians don't call themselves Americans, though they are South Americans. Etc., etc., etc......

People from the USA, and only people from the USA, call themselves Americans. There is no need for a separate term. Especially not one which is only useful in text form.

[(Anonymous)]

a lot of those people think they should be able to call themselves Americans, which is why they don't like using the term for people from the United States, and why they use the term USians instead

that's literally the entire point of the entire thing. that's the entire reason the concept exists in the first place - because they do consider themselves Americans and would call themselves that. the whole premise of your argument is wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

Forgive me if I find it silly to think a Canadian wakes up one day and thinks, hey *I* want to call myself American! Regardless of how long those silly-heads down south (who, crazily enough, have the term "America" incorporated into their country name...but wait, I can't be logical about this...) have been referring to themselves as Americans! North American is just not good enough! I MUST CAUSE CONFUSION TO FEEL MY CONTINENTAL IDENTITY.

[(Anonymous)]

Well, it is perfectly logical in and of itself. But there's also a pretty significant political element in it. Which is basically valid, but still I'm sure that's the next thing you'll freak out about. God why I am even in this discussion?

[lynx]

... Please do not speak for people from other parts of the American continent if you are from the USA or Canada. I don't think it's too much to ask for. Have you ever actually talked with someone from these countries you're so gleefully listing? Native residents, not people who have migrated to the USA.

I'm from Chile. I have family in Guatemala and Venezuela. I've also been in Argentina, Perú, Brazil, Mexico, Costa Rica, Cuba, República Dominicana, Haití, Honduras and El Salvador. If you ask them "¿Tú te consideras americano?"/"do you consider yourself American?" - the answer WILL be "yes". Because we are Americans. Just not An American.

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, so your premise is that people should be allowed to call themselves whatever they want. I challenge you to (if you can figure out how to pronounce it, since it's strictly an internet text term) walk up to the average American on the street and ask "Do you consider yourself USian?" The answer WILL be "no." Because we are Americans.

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, so your premise is that people should be allowed to call themselves whatever they want.

That... doesn't look anywhere near what Lynx said. Obviously, I can't speak for Lynx, not being Lynx. But I think it has more to do with, you know, people who live in the Americas should logically be called Americans. Which makes a certain amount of sense.

And for Pete's sake, there's definitely no need to throw a fit over it even if you disagree with it. I mean, I still call myself an American, but surely you can see the logic behind "People who live anywhere in the Americas are logically Americans", and the reasons why people might want to think that? It's really not that hard to understand.

[lynx]

*Sighs deeply* You don't read at all what I'm writing, isn't it.

1) USian is a recently coined term that aims to solve the unfortunate implicancies that the only "America" that counts is "The United States of America". The continent was named as America, a single America, way before you guys formed the original 13 colonies.

1.5) As a matter of fact, is not a strictly internet text term, and if I recall correctly, it's pronounced You-Ess-E-an.

2) You are indeed Americans. Nobody is stripping your nation of the right to be called an American nation. But the whole issue here, that I realize you refuse to see but it needs to be pointed, is that there are another 34 American nations. So you are an American, and I'm also American, and Inuits in the most northern part there are American, and Selk'nam here in the most southern part of the continent are American. Seriously; the USA is hogging a name that we all should be sharing. I hardly see how that's fair.

Indeed, I know that if I ask people from the USA if they are American, they'll always anser yes. What you're refusing to acknowledge is that if you actually ventured into any of the other counties in the continent (except for Canada, who share that worldview when it comes to geography) asking to the people "And, are you American?", you'd get a weirded out stare followed by an "Of course I am, I live in the American continent." Because that's what we've been taught. It's in our education and cultural heritage. Just take a look at the wiki in Spanish, for Pete's sake!

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/America

[ariakas]

We are not speaking speaking Spanish. We are speaking English. Words mean different things in different languages.

If Americans can learn Spanish, and learn that in Spanish/latino culture, "American" has a different meaning and that they would be more properly referred to as something else, without flipping over a table and barging into discussions in Spanish to demand that they get to change the meaning of the word to what they're used to in their culture/language...

...What on earth makes you think you get to do the same thing in English? What makes you think you should be treated with any more respect than the aforementioned example of an American demanding that everyone accommodate them in Spanish? That would be ludicrous.

This is just as ludicrous. In English, there are South Americans (from countries in South America), Central Americans (from countries in Central America), North Americans (from countries in North America), and Americas (from the United States of America). There is absolutely no confusion. In English, we do not call people from London or Tokyo or Mumbai "Eurasiafricans". The vast majority of the world does not refers to all people from "the Americas" as "Americans" - "American/kan/ski/jin" means "someone from the United States".

As it does in English. Call it, and Americans, and yourself whatever you want in Spanish. You can't demand someone change their language and culture because yours views the world differently. I thought we all agreed cultural imperialism was bad a long time ago.

[lynx]

Oh wow D: This is making me sad now. I used to have a whole lot of respect for you, back when we met at the SMT fandom.

You're an educated person. Please read the other answers I've managed to type despite of being actually very tired and anxious. It seems like you don't realize the power dynamics into play here. The US is one in 35 countries, and of those, 33 have a different concept of what constitutes "an American identity". Yet it's your concept the one who prevailed, by virtue of political and philosophical influence when you were fighting your Independence War.

The US is a World Power. The rest of us are stuck in the Third World, and trying to get out of there with varying degrees of success. It's kind of weird how you refer to "cultural imperialism is bad" without getting any vibe of cognitive disonnance. Because the reason you could actually get away with using "American" as a word that means "Someone from the USA" is... cultural imperialism.

[ariakas]

Because the reason you could actually get away with using "American" as a word that means "Someone from the USA" is... cultural imperialism.

How? Did the US force people to start using the term "Americans" to refer only to people from their own country in Spanish? Obviously not. You get to call yourselves, and them, whatever you want.

How do you not see that what you're doing is demanding that someone refer to themselves in their own language how you want to refer to them, as opposed to how they want to refer to themselves?

In English, the divide between North/Central/South America gives people an accurately descriptive continental name, and reserves the national name for the country that's always had it (as a national name, in English).

You're an educated person.

Yes, I am. I've travelled and been educated in various parts of the world. That is why I could call you on your attempt to claim the rest of the world as sharing your worldview. It doesn't. Kindly don't misrepresent the views of other nations.

I used to have a whole lot of respect for you, back when we met at the SMT fandom.

And having a debate about issues upon which we disagree changes this why, exactly?

[lynx]

I'm not demanding anything, and I've said ad nauseam that the only reason I'm still here debating at 3 am is that I'd like to have my point acknowledged, and only that. I'm not forcing the people of the USA to change the way they refer to themselves. My closing line for the first (or second?) post I did: "your view is valid, but so is mine. It's ok. Just please, don't ask of us to call you American in that way"

I've traveled the world too. And upwards there was an anon hailing from Central Europe that did say that there, in scholarly debates, the term "US-American" is used. Not just "American".

And having a debate about issues upon which we disagree changes this why, exactly?

Because I have good memories of those times, but now you've resorted to calling me a "cultural imperialist" just for disagreeing with you, and you're showing yourself as a painfully closed-minded individual that can't phathom the reason we Latin Americans + Caribbeans feel badly about this issue. You say it's all about linguistics (and it isn't), and political resentment (it isn't either). It's about cultural heritage and identity.

Most of us, from the paler Latino to the darkest, have mixed ancestry; and I'm not talking about blonde-caucasian-on-brunet-caucasian. Race is complicated, and we were deprived of our roots for centuries. But we all feel a sense of kinship on a basic level, no matter how we fight between us: We had indigenous ancesters that got enslaved and genocided, but also mixed their genes with the white Conquistadores, and black slaves brought from Africa. We're "Mestizos" ("mongrels"). We were colonized, had a religion imposed onto us, and got our liberty after. I doubt you know about this, but one of the most important things out of everything the Independency Wars gave us was that sense of kinship: "We may not know who the fuck we are, but we are brothers, and we'll help each other setting free the rest of America". Do you know about Simón Bolívar, by any chance? Read about him.

[(Anonymous)]

What gives you this idea that people get referred to by their chosen names? Scotland sure as fuck hasn't managed to stop the UK being called England in common parlance, it's still wrong. Let's not even talk about "Egypt".

That said, the word "American" is actually ambiguous - it might mean one thing, but also another! So no need to flip your shit when someone uses US-American (or USian, although that's really weird to my ears) to clarify what they actually mean. Especially when they're in a context where they actually constantly make that distinction, such as living on the part of the continent that is conveniently deemed unimportant by your chosen name.

[ariakas]

such as living on the part of the continent

The continent? Us Canadians just call ourselves Canadians. All of my Mexican friends and acquaintances are just fine with being called Mexican. Which part of North America becomes unimportant when people from the USA call themselves American? I live on the same continent as they do; I'm not.

[(Anonymous)]

Uhm, the continent (the Americas) does not just have three countries on it.

Canadians don't need to be called Canadian Americans because their chosen name is unambiguous, same for Mexicans.

There is literally a logical problem because the US's chosen names may logically also refer to millions upon millions of people who aren't from your country! This is not about the English language, it's about logic.

You have "Americans," but does it mean "Americans" from the continent(s) of America(s), or does it mean "Americans" from the country USA? Statistically it's more likely that we're talking about the USA, but statistically there are also way more people who have a claim to the "continental" definition of "American," so which do you choose?

The general rule of thumb would be that you specify when you're talking about the more specific case. Especially with South America (which is or isn't a thing depending on who you ask - and that one's got nothing to do with false language friends and everything to do with false geography friends, which are international, hurray!) becoming more and more of a player on the world stage, it makes sense to take into account the hundreds of millions of people who are accurately described by the term "American" but not "US-American" (such as yourself, apparently?) and just type those extra two letters. It's really not gonna kill anyone.

[(Anonymous)]

First encounter of the term here, but I don't see anything wrong with it. What pronunciation would you use? you-ess-ee-an, youse-ee-an, uss-eee-an?

[(Anonymous)]

Pardon the jinx.

[lynx]

You got it right on the first spelling :3 I've had debates in English using the neologism, and that's the way actual people from the US pronounced it. Believe it or not, the coining of "USian" takes the Spanish idea of "Estadounidense", but was born in liberal social studies circles inside your very own universities.