[ SECRET POST #2634 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2634 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lady Gaga]


__________________________________________________



03.
[free!, attack on titan]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(Panic! at the Disco)


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Anarky]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.)


__________________________________________________



11.
[Frozen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #376.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Okay here are some sources

[kaijinscendre]

It seems that it may not just be a matter of "OMG they only spent $5000 on the charity!"

http://nypost.com/2014/03/12/lady-gagas-charity-short-on-actual-charity-tax-records/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cynthia-germanotta/speaking-out-for-lady-gag_b_4952424.html

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/mar/14/lady-gaga-denies-born-this-way-foundation-funds

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Thank you for some sources I'm not embarrassed to have in my browser history.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[kaijinscendre]

Yeah those dailymail and jezebel links up top....

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Why do you think that the NY Post is better than the Daily Mail? It's just as trashy and is owned by the same people.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

I was talking about the guardian link, which I at least haven't heard tawdry things about.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Sorry to disappoint, but several of their journalists have run stories that turned out to be bogus, and/or hypocritical. Look up Johan Hari (who is also an egotistical dick, but that's by the by).

Re: Okay here are some sources

[kaijinscendre]

I just used that one because it listed all of the expenses. The other ones I found did not have it all laid out except the Dailymail. Which honestly? Has a shitty layout to me (all those sidebar articles).

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Wait. So you didn't discount the Daily Mail because it was disreputable; you discounted it because you don't like its layout?

Are you serious?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Right, so that's a bum source. They also provided two others. Move along. God, I can't believe people as fussy as you actually exist.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

This. Thanks so much for doing the sifting for the rest of us.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

"Sifting?"

They have admitted that one of the publications they've linked to is "shitty," and that the only reason they chose it is because it has a good layout.

Maybe you should do your own sifting rather than relying on someone else.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Wow. You have some serious issues with those publications, if you have to repeat this so many times.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Well, you're kind of right, in that I do have a pretty big problem with them. They are known to publish stories containing invented "facts." Why should I not have a problem with that? Why should I not speak out against that?

If you knew that someone was peddling misinformation, and you saw a bunch of people spreading said misinformation, would you keep your mouth shut?

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

bugupyourass!anon, please don't shit up my gratitude post, too. You've got plenty to play with already. Don't get greedy.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

There's no point in calling something out if it's only called out under certain circumstances.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[iggy]

Our activity has included The Born Brave Bus Tour, which has travelled to 23 communities, interacting with more than 19,000 young people and raising awareness to the tune of more than 300 million media impressions.

...That alone would cost uh---- far more than 5k, obviously.

Re: Okay here are some sources

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah. If there's "administrative costs" fuzziness going on, I wouldn't be surprised, but it's literally impossible for the charity's known actions to only cost $5K.

I thought I already replied to this

[elephantinegrace]

Apparently not. Well, the point is, thank you for the links. The information will further my research into which charities to donate to, if I have any money left over.

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[kaijinscendre]

This can help.
Worst Charities: http://www.tampabay.com/americas-worst-charities/
Article about them: http://www.tampabay.com/topics/specials/worst-charities1.page

Best Charities: http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Guide-to-Giving/America-s-Top-50-charities-How-well-do-they-rate

Search Engines for Charities:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/
http://www.charitywatch.org/
http://www.givewell.org/

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[(Anonymous)]

See, this is some actual good shit.

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[otakugal15]

Dude, FUCK. OFF. If you have that big a fucking shit fit over ONE FUCKING SOURCE, post some goddamn links yourself. Of which, I HAVE NOT SEEN.

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[misty_anon]

Yeah, precisely. Don't like Kajinscendre's links? Post your own.

Also, please get therapy. (Buguptheass anon, not you, Otakugal.)

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[(Anonymous)]

But I don't have to, given that she just posted some good ones.

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[(Anonymous)]

Take a break and clear your head. You're obsessing about trivial stuff and shitting all over the thread.

Re: I thought I already replied to this

[(Anonymous)]

Aw, you're right, anon. I'm feeling pretty good now, though.