Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-24 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2730 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2730 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #390.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
No one's story stood out. No one's story was original.
The movie was just a show case for mecha and monsters.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 23:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 00:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I get where you're coming from, if you were looking for something more than that. The movie was overhyped and it's a big problem. I think Mako fits in pretty well with what the movie was, and why it was good. It was a really well-executed, passionately made, monsters and robots movie that didn't make any awful mistakes and that was unconcerned about being formulaic. And Mako is kind of exactly the female POC main character that a film like that would have, if films like that usually had female POC main characters who were there primarily to be main characters.
no subject
Certainly not the ~masterpiece tumblr made it out to be, but I wasn't expecting it to be.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
While I think Mako had a very good story and personality, my personal disappointment came from the idea that I thought she was the leading protagonist (most of this hype obviously came from Tumblr) and not whoever-the-actual-lead-is (I forgot his name. XD) While Mako does have a story just as important to him and certainly more poignant, it's clear she's still not the main character. As a fellow Asian gal, I get that. But overall I thought the movie was good. Not masterpiece amazing like Tumblr makes it, but good. *shrugs*
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 00:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-25 12:52 am (UTC)(link)She wasn't even intelligent. But she had the little "foreign accent" and her personality was submissive, shy and quiet. I didn't find her interesting at all.
She knows karate and apparently that negates everything?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 02:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 02:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 05:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 04:04 (UTC) - ExpandTHAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
IT'S POC REPRESENTATION ISN'T QUITE AS GOOD BUT IT HONESTLY HAS A BETTER FEMALE LEAD.
I LIKED PACIFIC RIM BUT I'M SORRY EDGE OF TOMORROW IS A WAY BETTER MOVIE. JUST SAW IT THE SECOND TIME, AND YEP. STILL AMAZING. IT'S MAKING LIKE, NO FUCKING MONEY IN THE BOX OFFICE. IT GOT BEATEN BY HIPSTER NIC SPARKS CANCER MOVIE WHAT THE FUCK.
NERDS COMPLAINING ABOUT DUMB, SAMEY MOVIES BUT THEN NOT SEEING THIS MOVIE IS LIKE THOSE PEOPLE THAT BITCH ABOUT THE PRESIDENT NONSTOP BUT THEN DON'T VOTE.
DON'T BE LIKE THAT.
I KNOW THIS IS OBNOXIOUS AS FUCK BUT PLEASE SEE THIS MOVIE. PLEASE.
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 01:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 02:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 12:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 04:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 05:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 07:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 05:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 07:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 06:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 11:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 11:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 12:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 15:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 17:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
Re: THAT'S ALL GREAT BUT SEE EDGE OF TOMORROW
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-26 23:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I liked her all right, but she wasn't all she could have been. I didn't have much enthusiasm about her, but then again, the whole film didn't really ignite a lot of enthusiasm in me. So many potentially good elements that were played out in just a mediocre fashion. Not a bad movie, but just not good, either.
Then again, I don't touch tumblr, so I guess I had no reason to be disappointed with the hype.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-25 01:54 am (UTC)(link)Personally: Monsters and Robots> people characters.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 04:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-25 01:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
- hero with a troubled past, has to overcome his misgivings and learn to trust again (Raleigh)
- underdog being kept down by the system and prevented from reaching their dream, helped out by the hero (Mako)
- hardass general who loves his troops and gets shit done (Stacker)
- two bickering male scientists, soft vs. hard science (Newt and Hermann)
- nice older guy who tries to keep the peace (Herc)
- hotshot who's amazing at his job but rubs everyone the wrong way and picks a fight with the hero (Chuck)
It's a fun movie, don't get me wrong, but yeah, it's not as progressive as people want to think. Hell, there's only one female character of real significance, and the other one gets a few lines right before dying. In terms of gender representation, I'd say it was actually pretty REgressive.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 06:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-25 03:20 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 04:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 06:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject