Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-30 03:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2889 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2889 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)(Not really sure why this is a secret, tho).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
If you do, bitterness's completely understandable.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)It's how you (general you) handle them that's the issue. If someone's bitter as hell that their ship isn't canon, that's fine unless they're going around trashing other ships and other fans and stuff. That goes true with any opinion.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Also, preferring a slash pairing isn't sexism. And you can legitimately dislike a female character too the same way you would dislike a male character. That isn't sexism in and of itself.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 05:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 09:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 10:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 11:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 11:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 07:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 09:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 14:29 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 12:08 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 05:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 21:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 04:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 22:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 08:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 07:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 14:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 21:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 12:27 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 07:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 12:48 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 02:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 05:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 06:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 20:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 21:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 09:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 10:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 06:58 am (UTC)(link)I've been in various femslash, slash, and het shipping fandoms and misogyny and character bashing are looked down on by the majority of people. It is seldom ever encouraged.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-30 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 12:38 am (UTC)(link)I do feel like for a lot of het fans, it's not good enough that their pairings are canon (or at least have a chance), they also have to be snide to us oh so delusional fangirls who are too dumb to know it'll never be canon. Yes, I know it's not going to be canon, so what if I dare to say I want it to be?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 02:27 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 09:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 00:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
That shit is always so irritating. I mean, okay, fine, maybe 1% of slashers seriously think the creators are secretly involved in some big conspiracy to make a slash pairing canon, but 99% know it's non-canon and waiting for canon validation is not their reason for shipping it. The possibility of "endgame" validation is such a big pot-at-the-end-of-the-rainbow for ongoing het ships that it seems to screw with a lot of het fans' perspectives on shipping.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 07:15 am (UTC)(link)I don't care if it's slash or het, I ship whatever I find to have a good dynamic. Though it is kinda sad that if the slash ship has a good dynamic it has 0% chance of becoming canon. That's probably why these ships attract more fanwork, to fill in the void.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 10:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 01:15 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 05:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 05:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-08 01:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 07:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 08:49 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 06:54 am (UTC)(link)Whenever I ship a slash pairing that has a great foundation I get frustrated that it will never be canon whereas hetero ships gets a free pass simply for being het.
Whenever I ship het I always want a bigger fandom with more fanwork. Sometimes slash pairings get super popular with zero basis and get massive fandoms and treat het ships like the plague.
It seems rare that somebody is completely satisfied with their ship. If you can get a good canon basis with a decent amount of fanwork and zero fandom drama, then you hit the jackpot.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 08:58 am (UTC)(link)I have a friend who multiships and never gets shit from the het shippers when she reblogs the slash ship too, the only times she ever gets hate messages and unfollowers is when she reblogs the het ship and the slash fans act like she's doing something super bad (she tags everything so ppl could blacklist the ships they hate)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 11:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 20:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-01 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)You've invaded 99% of my actual OTP fics on AO3. You invade EVERYTHING. Why isn't that enough for you?
Off topic but...some of the comments remind me of Destihellers.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 12:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 13:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 22:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-01 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 02:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-12-02 06:37 (UTC) - Expand