Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-06-15 06:56 pm
[ SECRET POST #3085 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3085 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #441.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 02:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)Let's break it down based on my experience (which doesn't necessarily speak for everyone).
The canon shippers I know generally write fic mostly because they want to explore the universe as established in canon. So to them, shipping might only be a small part of it in the first place. It's how they can explore those canon relationships and dynamics, including the romantic ones. Even if it is a large part, the need to explore canon is why. Whereas I think non-canon shippers still very much want to play with the world, but they also want to write an alternative take.
What I will say is that it's also been my experience that canon shippers may be more prone to leave fandom once the canon is closed, with non-canon shippers staying behind.
Again, just what I've seen. Perhaps someone has a different perspective.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)But I've seen a lot of excellent writers deal with break-ups and then getting their pair to become closer.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 04:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
I have also encountered many canon shippers who are extremely rabid, or very very focused on the shipping aspects and not just as 'part of the canon'.
So that's my different perspective. (I'm not saying that what you're describing isn't accurate as well! Just giving a second opinion)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)Compare that to noncanon shippers where none of them, obviously are going to be getting what they'd prefer from canon. It just seems obvious that noncanon pairings will have an edge in terms of fic because of this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Now, for non-canon ships that don't break up a canon couple, yeah, I don't know why they'd be surprised at those being more popular, especially since there are way more different possibilities for how to write the arc and dynamics of a romantic relationship (especially first-time stories) for non-canon couples.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)But is that necessarily true? Couldn't removing a canon ship just be a continuation of canon? For example, if you wrote a Harry Potter post-epilogue fanfic where one character in a pairing dies and so they get together with another character, would that necessarily be AU?
Also, I've always gotten the impression that there's a lot of fanfiction that deals not only with the canon world but also with fixing things that the reader or viewer doesn't like (whether it's a ship or a plot point).
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)with respect, I'm not entirely on board with that argument. It seems to me that the same logic would apply to all fanfic ever written - and while that might be the case, I don't think it's a very useful definition of an AU
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
Ducking phone errors left ducking in because they're ducking funny.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 15:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 03:32 am (UTC)(link)Like Lupin/Tonks. I hate that pairing. And I hate reading something unrelated and then suddenly OH YAS AND HERE IS LUPIN AND TONKS AND THEY ARE TTLY MAKING OUT BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY BUMPING UGLIES LONKS4EVER!!!!
Like... no. If it doesn't matter to your fic if they're together or not then just leave out any mention of it and let the reader either assume canon-compliant or happily headcanon whatever. And if it is important, tag it. "Mentions of Lupin/Tonks" or whatever, just some warning.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 11:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 01:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Obviously people can and do write about established relationships, too, but in my experience those are comparatively few and far between even for popular non-canon ships.
no subject
As the flamingo says:
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-15 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-15 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 01:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 02:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 02:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 04:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 01:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 01:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 12:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 14:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-16 15:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
There is also nothing wrong with just wanting more of a canon pairing (and the dynamics that come with it) that you already love, but I'm rarely surprised at non-canon pairings popularity because there are SO many ways you can go.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 01:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-16 03:08 am (UTC)(link)