Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-16 03:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #3147 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3147 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Is it considered Not Okay to draw someone in Native traditional wear if the artist isn't Native? (Is that an accurate depiction of the garb for a particular tribe? does it make a difference if it is?)
All of these are honest questions. I honestly don't know a whole hell of a lot about the social politics surrounding Native Americans and appropriation. I'm curious as to what exactly is going on.
(Also, like someone else asked: how do you know this person is friends with a pedophile?
I want the deets come on)CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)Here's what I found!
Re: CONTEXT
e: "Drew genderbents"? Really. Really.
ee: apparently shipping unhealthy pairings is "apologism" now?
SA
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: SA
SA, more stuff on the pedo thing
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 20:43 (UTC) - ExpandSA - articles on the guy being a convicted pedophile
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 20:45 (UTC) - ExpandSA - the deleted artwork in question
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 20:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: SA - the deleted artwork in question
Re: SA - the deleted artwork in question
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 21:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: SA - the deleted artwork in question
Re: SA - the deleted artwork in question
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 21:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: SA - the deleted artwork in question
Re: SA - the deleted artwork in question
Re: SA - the deleted artwork in question
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 20:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
eee: "sexualized underage female characters" they're in swimsuits in a cartoony style oh my god
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)http://izzybutt.tumblr.com/post/72821710046/the-term-genderbending-is-transphobic-say-instead
Apparently it's transphbic now? IDGI
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Also one of the posts on that blog says that white people can't cosplay Asians, which like--- renders 99% of anime cosplay 'problematic'? Okay.)
I mean if the pedophilia is true, they deserve to be slammed, but bringing in some of the other stuff honestly just makes them look less credible.
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 01:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 01:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 02:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-18 04:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)Nothing on the list is evil. The list itself is.
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)Does anyone know what those words even mean?
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-16 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
I'm so confused.
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 03:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 03:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-18 03:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 12:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 04:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
The comment on Native Fluttershy did make me go "...really?" but again, it sounded like Zamii meant well and didn't realize they were putting their foot in it. And I know this might piss some people off but hostility really isn't a useful response.
I didn't see a lot there about the pedophile friend thing, just one broken link?
ETA: ok, he's a pedophile (or an ephebophile as the case may be, creepy either way) but is she friends with him? Does he have any remorse? I'd need to see details before making a big ol' judgment call and to be honest I'm kind of inclined to not poke my nose into something like this on the internet when there's always so much you can't see.
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-16 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)It's clearly still there, it's just drawn in a different style.
:/
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-17 12:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-17 04:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: CONTEXT
(Anonymous) 2015-08-17 01:31 am (UTC)(link)Wow, though -- that list definitely reeks of artist grudge more than anything else. Like, I feel like I need to make a counter list to explain everything wrong with that list (bad faith interpretations of everything that comes out of this person's mouth, gender bends = transphobic?, ship/kink policing like WHOA, using the word shota = endorsing pedophilia?, race essentialism (Indian people have to have big noses and black people have to have afros??)).