Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-30 03:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #3314 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3314 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)Like this Barbie line should have happened a long time ago but Barbie is only being progressive now because they finally see the profit in it.
I do think the Barbie line is cuter, but if people want Lammily they should have that option too.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)I was reading something on the Internet, and I remember a commenter that kind of read my mind. I think it was on Huff Post. On some story, he posted a comment that said something like 'To the male, to me, Barbie…she kind of looks alien-like.' And that's what sparked it. I agree. If Barbie were a real woman, she'd be intimidating and cold, and what I like about real women is that they're warm and friendly. I just wanted to create an image that would reflect that.
I don't mind that he wanted to do this, but his intentions seem kind of odd.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 04:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Including some of Mattel's own brands...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)Personally Lammily pisses *me* off because her body shape is just as unlikely for me as Barbie's is for anyone else. And therefore declaring her the perfect example of the average woman I feel like they're telling me that my body type (short and skinny) is freakish. and I need to step aside because Real Woman Have Curves
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)I don't think either should be brought out as representative of *everyone*. When you have one doll mold, that's impossible. For Lammily proposing the idea of multiple dolls on the first run may have been too costly (keep in mind that before all the attention, this was someone with nowhere near the money or resources of Barbie.)
That's why I think the new Barbie line of several dolls is a good thing. But I don't think it needs to KILL Lammily if people really want Lammily, like I said, I think the Barbie line is cuter and I don't like Lammily myself but I'm not going to wish something gone just because I'm not into it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 12:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:16 am (UTC)(link)Even Barbie is based on reality to a certain extent, it's not like she's supposed to be some alien.
It's fine to enjoy the fantasy of Barbie but some people may like a different type of doll. Everyone is different, this is true for kids as well.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 04:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)http://dragondicks.tumblr.com/post/103165229060/whats-up-with-the-lammily-thing-ive-seen-a
http://dragondicks.tumblr.com/post/113175695365/so-in-effectlammily-was-more-or-less-a-failure-at
http://purplemonkfish.tumblr.com/post/103144931351/regarding-lammily
http://ohbeesneeze.tumblr.com/post/138223021343/the-funniest-thing-about-the-new-barbie
http://oak23.tumblr.com/post/131376617475/none-of-these-unhemmed-glued-together-outfit-packs
http://neon-genesis-evandoglion.tumblr.com/post/78778978995/make-lammily-a-rocker-give-her-some-ripped-jeans
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)Like I don't really like the doll myself, I already said as much, but I think if other people like it then that's great and they should buy it. Barbie SHOULD have competition in the market, Barbie not having competition makes it hard to get the company to ever change. But when there's more competition change happens a lot quicker.
I love fantasy dolls, I'm not arguing against that at all, I am saying that if the market has room for both, why not have both?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-30 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)Cute.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 12:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Your move. She run over your dog while fucking your mother and burning down your house?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:19 am (UTC)(link)If I had linked to a bunch New York Times articles that supported my view on a certain topic, would you claim that I held that view "because the New York Times told me to"? Somehow I doubt it.
And by the way, I wouldn't say I hate Lammily. Hate is a rather strong word for something so insignificant. But I do find the ideology behind her creation irritating, and it would give me a sick sense of satisfaction if the dolls ceased production. It's petty, I know that. That's why I've posted this opinion to Fandom Secrets.
You seem very angry about this. Perhaps you should go take a nap.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Yep, I would have. Getting your opinion from one site is fucking stupid.
You seem very angry about this. Perhaps you should go take a nap.
Says someone who is so angry at a hunk of plastic that they want it to not exist anymore. lol.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:29 am (UTC)(link)Says someone who is so angry at a hunk of plastic that they want it to not exist anymore. lol.
You seem to be under the impression that I'm a lot more upset about this than I actually am. Haven't you ever looked at something you found annoying and thought yourself "Gee, this thing sure is annoying. I wish it would go away." ?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 01:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 02:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-31 03:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 04:51 am (UTC)(link)For the love of god please tell me that's not real merchandise for a doll... because it looks like shit I could make with 0 sewing experience and cheap materials. When I was 10.
Re: OP
Ugh, yeah, that's... that's just bad.