Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-20 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3364 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3364 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Glass Scientists]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Ghostbusters remake]
__________________________________________________
04.

[All for One Webseries]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Castle]
__________________________________________________
06.

[DC Comics]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Reign of Fire]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Steven Universe]
__________________________________________________
09.

[K. Tempest Bradford]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Against the Wall]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Queer Literature, "In the Company of Shadows"]
__________________________________________________
12.

(Star Wars Rebels)
__________________________________________________
13.

[Jeeves and Wooster, P.G. Wodehouse]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Giles Coren]
__________________________________________________
15.

[James Marsters/Rick Grimes of The Walking Dead]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[Ghostbusters remake]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)But, I don't know WHY they decided a remake was the way to go. Having them be a different Ghostbusters group (maybe in a different city) would have made more sense and ruffled less feathers.
And I don't like how they've made the one black character a black stereotype ("Oh hell naw" REALLY?).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 21:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 21:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 21:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 07:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 22:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 07:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 21:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)Is that a good thing?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 05:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 22:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
But I'm still firmly on the 'cautiously optimistic' bandwagon -always thinking to myself, 'Please don't suck, please don't suck...'-, because for me, it all boils down to the cast having the right chemistry with one another. Also if the jokes don't rely too much on cheap shock value, but we'll see.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)I bet you were one of the defenders when it was first announced screaming about how the only reason people were saying it was going to be shit was the all woman cast and everyone who had worries was a neckbeard.
Triggered much.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 22:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 22:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 23:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 23:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 03:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 20:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Honestly, I'm ready for 90% of the remakes coming out this year. The only one I have no expectation of is Pete's Dragon.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)but these movies are *not* this fucking amazing nerd property that is soooo precious and needs to be protected from the vile hands of studio execs/sjws/etc.
it's just a decent '80s movie with the best in american comedy at the time. it doesn't need fanboy slobber all over it.
(that said, i don't care either way about the female cast or the male cast, but i do know that from the trailer, sony have made it look extremely cheap and pandering to nostalgia rather than standing on its own two feet as a decent standalone movie that explores the same storyline but with just a female cast.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 21:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-20 22:01 (UTC) - ExpandThat's absolutely part of his characterization.
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 01:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)Hopefully the studio will blame the possible poor box office on the fact that it's a remake, not on the cast.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 02:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
But I don't feel a need to get all upset about it, I'll leave that to other people.
no subject
A rainy day tired night kind of movie.
no subject
I'm not going to see the remake, I don't care if Chris Hemsworth is in it, it's not getting my money. I also don't care for McCarthy.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 05:44 am (UTC)(link)I feel like the only person who liked the original and is genuinely looking forward to this new one for reasons that aren't about defending feminism. Why can't I like both?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-21 06:19 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:20 am (UTC)(link)