Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-02-20 06:18 pm
[ SECRET POST #4066 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4066 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #582.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 12:52 am (UTC)(link)"I don't like wearing skirts, or pink, and I like videogames, but that's fine, because hobbies and clothing don't need to be gendered anyway!" has become "I don't like wearing skirts, or pink, and I like videogames, that means I must not be a girl, so obviously I'm non-binary, or bi-gender, because I like boy things too!"
It's contradictory, and really sets back what people have been trying achieve for literally years. You're basing your identity on outdated sexism people have been trying to get past. You're taking a step backwards, here.
This sort of stuff is literally no different. Transgender people have been saying for ages that you don't need a penis to be a man, or a vagina to be a woman, to the point where relatively mainstream media are now saying 'people who have periods' instead of 'women'.
And yet... here's this person (and others like them), saying they're non-binary AND a woman, presumably ... because they have a vagina.
It's frustrating. People wanting to tick too many identity boxes make it very hard for others to be taken seriously.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 12:55 am (UTC)(link)People being non-binary is not entrenching sexist stereotypes, any more than the existence of trans people is entrenching sexist stereotypes. It's the same argument and it's not any more valid.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Trans issues are different because they are defined by dysphoria and the desire to transition to both the societal role opposite their birth sex inclusive and their physical sex (whether or not this surgical transition is feasible for them in their situation).
If you can't define what it means to "feel like a guy" or "feel like a girl", then what even is the point? Before this discourse, we were fighting to downplay the importance of gender at all - no thoughts, no presentation, no behaviors, no hobbies define femininity nor masculinity. Now it seems to me young activists are trying to categorize gender with no intent but to have other people validate and acknowledge them for doing it.
no subject
Well, there's no accounting for teen stupidity, but that's one heck of of a straw man.
No, you're not genderqueer because you dress butch, or because you have the wrong hobby. You might be genderqueer if you come to the conclusion that the work of shutting that off on a regular basis because of safety or to pay the rent (a necessity for most trans people in the closet) is slowly killing you.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 03:00 am (UTC)(link)what. substantiate that. You described being trans and having serious gender dysphoria, not "genderqueer".
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 21:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 22:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 22:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-22 15:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 21:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:15 am (UTC)(link)If somebody decides they're only nb purely because they're resisting gender stereotypes, it is absolutely entrenching them in the process.
It's the same as saying 'girls can't like sport because it's a boy thing'. If you have to be at least somewhat 'boy' to like sport, it's 100% entrenching the problematic stereotype.
To decide you're nonbinary purely because you're into stuff not traditionally associated with your gender, you're probably very immature and it's a reflection on this immaturity. If your hobbies and interests define your gender in your eyes, it's a problem.
If somebody decides they're non-binary not based on hobbies, or preferences, in stuff traditionally designed by social acceptance, that's not the same thing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 12:57 am (UTC)(link)The societal role? Then isn't that just upholding it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 03:08 am (UTC)(link)If I woke up tomorrow with no breasts, a penis, and balls, I would still be a woman in my own consciousness. Was/am I a "tomboy"? Yup. Do I like things that are both stereotypically male and stereotypically female? Yup. But I, myself, if you ask me, am female.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 03:47 am (UTC)(link)Maybe that's an extreme example, but I can't imagine most people spend a lot of time thinking about their gender internally unless it constantly comes up (such as in a sexist society) or is a source of trouble for them (i.e. trans people).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 09:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 01:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 14:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 03:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 01:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 02:05 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-02-21 02:28 (UTC) - Expandno subject