Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-05-05 05:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #5964 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5964 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Murdoch Mysteries]
__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Reservation Dogs, season 2]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #852.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)Most female characters are written to be female first and character maybe. I'm the anon that someone here loves to call a troll because I grew up in the middle of bumfuck nowhere in a religious town and only had TV as my link to the outside world, and related only to male characters because they were allowed to BE characters (and not just love interests destined to be wives and baby makers), and thus for a while thought I might be a dude.
I've found as time goes on that more and more female characters ARE being written as more character than female as to be enjoyable to watch, but a lot of writers who can pull off that apparently amazing feat don't seem to be able to hit the spot for me with making them interesting enough to read about/shippable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 12:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 02:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 09:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 02:50 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Reply to all 3 above -
I lived in the middle of bumfuck nowhere religiousville, so guess what kind of shows the stations there would play. We were also poor. No cable for me.
Also, I finally did see Buffy once I got to college; it bored the crap out of me.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)But they're not claiming to represent "trends." Since when does anyone's experience have to be normal or statistically average to belong on fandom!secrets?
Re: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 01:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 02:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 02:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 05:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 12:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-07 10:43 (UTC) - ExpandThis
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-07 22:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)Not... not really:
https://thetvprofessor.com/the-history-of-working-women-as-seen-on-tv/
https://sites.gatech.edu/1102tvfem/2018/09/20/changes-in-womens-careers-portrayed-by-popular-television-throughout-time-john-ryu/
https://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/files/2014-15_Boxed_In_Report.pdf
https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1001&context=jouruht
https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/sorry-ladies-study-on-women-in-film-and-television-confirms-the-worst-65220/
Re: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 01:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 05:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-05 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)Male characters were more likely than females to be identified only by a work-related role, such as doctor or business executive (61% of males vs. 34% of females). In contrast, female characters were more likely than males to be identified only by a personal life-related role such as wife or mother (58% of females vs. 31% of males). Male and female characters were equally likely to be identified in dual work-related and personal life-related roles (8% of females and males).
SOURCE: https://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 12:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 12:42 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 01:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 01:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 02:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 07:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 12:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 03:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 03:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 07:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 10:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 12:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 13:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 16:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 11:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 03:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 13:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 18:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-05-06 16:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 05:19 am (UTC)(link)Both things can be true at the same time.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Fanfiction has been very helpful for me, there. There are a lot of female characters that are a complete miss, for me, in canon, that become delightful and relatable and even shippable, in the hands of some fan authors.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-06 01:43 am (UTC)(link)