Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-11-08 07:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #1771 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

__________________________________________________
41.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 157 secrets from Secret Submission Post #253.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 1 2 3 4 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:07 am (UTC)(link)I've only ever read bad books in other languages, so it's nice to see the English version of bad writing and how to fix it. The things that are considered mistakes in English are not always the same in other languages, so it's nice to learn more about the specifics. I wish I had learned all that stuff in school!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:17 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 01:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:04 am (UTC)(link)My understanding of what is and what isn't good writing has literally multiplied, and I think I'm becoming a better writer since reading that.
I, um, don't really care about the Twilight aspect of it. I'm just in it for the grammar and writing lessons. :I
O_o?
Or are you saying that this blog is a good example of how not to write a book?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Your criteria for "good book" seems awfully arbitrary.
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 01:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 02:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 02:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 02:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 02:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 03:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 06:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 19:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 19:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-10 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-10 03:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 09:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
Re: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
(Anonymous) - 2011-11-09 04:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: O_o?
no subject
no subject
I also like how she points out that they don't have anything in common. Mark also does that but I like how he points out that at times Meyer has a good sentence or two, but then she ruins it. o_o
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 05:02 am (UTC)(link)I've never read Twilight so maybe I'm not getting the context but some of the examples they put up I'm just like, "...so?"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-11-09 05:24 am (UTC)(link)This from someone who dislikes Twilight. Just, really, its writing quality is not that relevant. It's ultimately plain old boy candy. It's not bad for girls to have boy candy.
no subject
no subject