Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-04-05 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #1920 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1920 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26. http://i42.tinypic.com/21m7v28.png
[linked for... sort of scribbly porny, not really]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #274.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-05 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)And the shippers are going to ship no matter what. Deal or get out.
no subject
My only potential problem with Elementary is that Lucy Liu's character won't be a badass Army doctor, and only because how awesome would that be if she was?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Fingers crossed that Joan is a lesbian (even though I know it won't be so).
no subject
Also I doubt Sherlock/John shippers need a heterosexual pairing of the characters to think "you know, that totally works!" - they're already shipping it. I too prefer a bromance rather than romance reading but BBC's Sherlock dances between the two so can't say I blame 'em.
no subject
So yeah. While it would be nice to have a show where the leads aren't paired off when they're of the opposite gender, this is one show where I desperately want it. And I don't even care about Sherlock Holmes.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 02:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 16:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 16:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-09 20:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 04:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-09 20:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-05 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)This often gets excused as wanting to stay true to the originals, and not wanting to ruin their friendship. However, if an adaptation like Elementary, where one of the main characters is gender flipped, has a romantic relationship between them it would emphasise that it's fuck all to do with "keeping to the original canon" and everything about "we can't possibly have a romance with two leading male characters"!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-05 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-05 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)And fyi, they've already made a statement that they "won't go there".
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-05 23:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-05 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-05 23:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 02:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Is it going to be like Sherlock? Of course not. But I don't want it to be. Just like I didn't want Sherlock to be another Rathbone copy.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 04:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 12:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 17:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
It's not like we don't have access to the other billions of Sherlock Holmes stories. Which, by the way, you can read or watch any time you need your epic bromance fix.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-05 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 12:30 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 04:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
When it airs, we can rip it to shreds on it's merits or lack thereof, but at this point criticism just seems premature, overly-defensive, and tinfoily.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 02:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-07 07:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-07 14:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 01:37 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 03:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 02:22 am (UTC)(link)Whereas gay people are mistaken for straight all the time and that's perfectly okay.
Yeah fuck you OP.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 02:51 am (UTC)(link)And then her and Joan can get it on. COME AT ME, OP.
Honestly, though, I'm more interested in the crimes, you know, detecting and plot and stuff? That there will be a prominant, strong (hopefully) female character in this adaptation is just a bonus.
no subject
If they're a couple in some, but just have an epic friendship in others, then so what? None of these are exactly the same as the source material, and people aren't going to ~get the wrong idea~ just from one adaptation doing things differently. People already have ~the wrong idea~. There's a theory that's been floating around for years that Watson is secretly a woman and married to Sherlock in the original books. Slash fandom's pretty tame compared to that sort of thing.
Sucks that whether the relationship's likely to be platonic or romantic depends on the genders, though. Because a man and a woman can't just be friends, and if you actually think that people could possibly be queer then you're ~getting the wrong idea~
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 03:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 04:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 04:02 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 15:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-06 04:24 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 17:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-06 20:59 (UTC) - Expand