Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-01 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2069 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2069 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[The City of Dreaming Books]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[Teen Girl Squad]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

[Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Avengers]
__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

[The Monkees]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Important: I'm really sorry about this, but I accidentally clicked the wrong thing and deleted the submission post from last week instead of saving it. Managed to save the first page (25) of secrets, but the rest (a bit over 100) are gone.
If you submitted something last week (Aug 26-Sept 1), please resubmit it here and it will still go up this week.
The submissions post for next week is linked below as usual.
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #296.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)asking ppl not to draw child porn
SO ENTITLED
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 17:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I mean, wherever I go within animation-based ones, I usually see art that ages them down and up. I like the variety idk, but seriously what fandom are you in that specialises in making everyone only sexy babies? oh my god
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)It's interesting because I've found in terms of hentai doujinshi that the uke and woman tend to be the most drastically changed whereas the seme and man tend to be drawn relatively the same as they are in canon.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)is this a sad attempt to start pubic hair wank
of course, any dude whosays he cant tell the difference between a child and a grown woman with a waxed vag, is a pedo
but how this relate to not liking child porn
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 01:36 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 18:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)But the other part of it is that a lot of Japanese people look young to someone with Western eyes, IMO. (Like the "no womanly hips" thing.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Like, when Snape has the same face as Ginny, you've got a problem.
no subject
Although yeah, a lot of generic "anime-esque" art from western artists has that problem.
+1
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 01:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 12:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 14:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 15:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)altho having snape and ginny at same time is also big problem
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)16 years old is actually not an easy age to capture (at least in a stylized animation form), mainly because if you draw a girl too mature looking she will end up looking like a full grown adult, and if you go too far the other way then they will indeed all look like about 12 (or even younger.)
I usually go for the younger looking 16 year old and make them look nothing like I did when I was 16, but I also don't draw NSFW stuff for any character that isn't an adult.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)idc what age of consent is, is 16 here, still wrong
high school kids =/= adults imo
but yeah i think 16 can go either way
there isnt a defined look rly
in high school, some girls looked like college students, others like middle school students, there is natural variety, meither is bad
but maybe not put any of them in porn lol
So 16 yrs olds can't draw 16 yr olds?
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 06:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: So 16 yrs olds can't draw 16 yr olds?
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 08:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: So 16 yrs olds can't draw 16 yr olds?
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 19:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)can we just not draw nsfw pics of anyone under 18 tho
i rly dont care about age of consent
age of consent is 16 where i live
doesnt make it right
the law is fucked up sometimes
and anyone who draws nsfw of a child (16) is either a child or a pedo
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-01 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 01:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-04 21:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 01:38 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 04:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 19:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-02 12:09 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 01:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-02 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject