[ SECRET POST #2148 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

02. http://i49.tinypic.com/24wgcoh.jpg

[elephantinegrace]

But Marvel had Sleipnir as a character, meaning that Loki is at least horse-sexual. (Or forgot to use a condom and was very unlucky.)

Scratch that, you can have sex with someone without being sexually attracted to them.

[(Anonymous)]

sleipnir jesus fucking christ sleipnir is my literal favourite character from norse mythology tbh its so ridiculous

i hope sleipnir makes it into the cinematic universe somehow because i really want to see people confused and or crying

[(Anonymous)]

In comics canon, I'm pretty sure both Sleipnir and Hela have been retconned out of being Loki's kids, though I have no idea about the rest of 'em.

[insanenoodlyguy]

No. dude fucks horses cause he's a horse fucker. That's how loki rolls.

[(Anonymous)]

You are not alone, OP.
Also, can we please have more asexual characters in films/series? Romance and couples in general bore me so much.

[intrigueing]

This ability of fans to headcanon these utterly plot-unrelated things about characters out of nowhere will never cease to mystify me. I'm not saying it's bad or wrong or stupid at all, but I just don't understand how people do it.

[visp]

I approve of this canon, if only to piss of the hordes of really weird Loki fangirls.

[(Anonymous)]

Interesting! I've always thought of him as the kind of person who doesn't care about sex but wouldn't hesitate to use it to manipulate people.

Warm

[trollometer]

Points for taking an two old wank subjects and splicing them together to make something new.

[(Anonymous)]

I never understood the concept of headcanon. Especially since often times "headcanon" will contradict actual canon.

[lovelycudy]

He has children in the comics, though. And tricks Sigyn into marrying him because he's horny. And in JiM he seems interested in Leah and Ikol mentions that his old self was better with women... so yeah, I see why your headcanon is not more popular. Maybe Film!Loki?

[(Anonymous)]

Me too! Well, asexual, at least. (Still willing use sex if necessary to manipulate people as a last resort, though. I don't see Loki dropping such a good tool from his arsenal, but that's exactly how he'd see it: as a tool.) I could go either way on the romantic-aromantic thing, but I admit I lean toward the latter. I wish there was more fic that depicted him that way.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm going to assume you mean Movie!Loki (because Marvel!Loki = comic!Loki, etc), in which case, I guess there's nothing to contradict that interpretation.

[forgottenjester]

Maybe I'm weird but I assume every character is asexual and uninterested in romance until told otherwise. And it doesn't have to be canon that tells me. I'll let fics go in a sexual and romantic direction even if the canon never has for the character.

I just... that's the default for all characters for me. I don't know why.

[(Anonymous)]

I ship him with a couple different characters, but ultimately... yeah, I think in the canon, he's most likely not interested in sex or romance except as a tool for manipulation.

[agentcthulhu]

I have no strong feelings about this one way or another. Nice screencap though.

[serenitysquid]

This thread has been surprisingly civil (so far), considering the subject matter. Has the curse of the Loki-wank been lifted or something?

Anyway, I like this headcanon.

[(Anonymous)]

He doesn't seem too interested in sex in either Thor or The Avengers, granted he seems to have a lot on his mind. But he also doesn't seem to like women very much as exhibited by his attitude toward both Jane in Thor and Black Widow in the Avengers.

At the very least he seems kind of misogynistic.

[rbhudson]

Agreed. Idk why, because Norse mythology would deem otherwise, but who says Marvel cares about sticking to the truths of Norse myth?

[writerserenyty]

As someone who's only seen the films, I think that to Loki sex is not quite as relevant and other things are more important; I don't have a strict idea of his sexuality.

[dazzledfirestar]

I would tend to agree with you OP. Whether he is actually asexual/aromantic or just doesn't see it as a priority. Either way, I think its very easy to read Loki (MCU!Loki) that way.

[(Anonymous)]

I always figured he was like Mike from the Roomies!verse - he's whatever you don't want him to be.

[wauwy]

how stunningly special

snxxxxxxxxxxxxx