Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-10 03:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2231 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2231 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)Still boring.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 04:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I could see the flat, one-dimensional denial/generalization if this was in response so some idiot going on about how it's SOOOO much better when the hero is a goody two-shoes, but if you're talking about it unprovoked, then why would you do so unless you wanted to start a conversation?
Basically, I feel like you walked into a garden party, announced that flowers were boring, had someone show you a flower they thought was cool, denounced that as boring too, and walked out. And the purpose of the party was to discuss various kinds of flowers and their relative merits. I'm gonna stop this metaphor before it runs away from me, or develops bad puns. But just... why would you do that?
*I'm assuming this is the same person from the beginning of the thread. If not, sorry, and you're right.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)But I personally adored Chris Evan's square-jawed idealism. It was refreshing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 03:21 am (UTC)(link)616!Cap may be a self-righteous douche; from what I've heard, Ultimates!Cap definitely is. But MCU!Cap is a different character, and I honestly found it refreshing that he wasn't a self-righteous, arrogant bag of dicks, because that's become so much the expectation that subverting it is novel and interesting.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 03:40 am (UTC)(link)You mean when he's got PTSD?
Not to mention the scene(s?) in which he's obviously being affected by Loki's sceptre, along with the rest of the Avengers except for Tony.
For someone dealing with recent trauma plus a ton of present day emotional stress (both situational and magically-induced), I think he's doing pretty well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 04:12 am (UTC)(link)Jealous of Peggy's and Howard's relationship (or what he imagines their relationship to be). Awkward with women...and not in a "cute" way, but in a way that's genuinely cringeworthy. Naive. Stubborn to a fault.
He's a great guy, no doubt about it, but I definitely think he has enough flaws to be a good character, as well.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I found Cap really refreshing because he WASN'T that.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 06:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject