Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-20 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2241 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2241 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. removed!
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)That'll show her! She'll really feel bad after you publicize her novel, both by making a secret about it and by writing a ton of stories about it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 04:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 09:33 am (UTC)(link)Now I won't nor will I check out anything else by her or even gift the book. It's gonna sit around collecting dust. I didn't even know she was popular or about that ridiculous rant that I just read. When authors pull that crap, it's automatically a cue for me to tap out. And cheerlead for people who do write spite fanfic.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 13:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
She's allowed her opinions about fanfic of her work.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:08 am (UTC)(link)So she can do it, but if a fan writes fanfic where the characters have sex, that's sullying them. Whatevs, lady.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 03:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 10:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 12:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:18 am (UTC)(link)http://kate-nepveu.livejournal.com/483239.html
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 12:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 16:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-22 00:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 03:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 03:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 16:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 17:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 17:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:05 am (UTC)(link)Is it more historical fiction, or more romance? Would someone who hates the typical harlequin-romance tropes end up being put off?
Re: Not quite on topic, but
Re: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not quite on topic, but
Re: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not quite on topic, but
Re: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:54 (UTC) - ExpandSame poster as before...
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not quite on topic, but
Re: Not quite on topic, but
Re: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 09:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not quite on topic, but
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 22:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I honestly don't hate an author for not liking fanfiction, but they can't stop people from writing about their characters doing whatever, it's annoying that they try.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 05:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:10 am (UTC)(link)On a side note, I quite liked that series. And, of course, it was originally an AU Doctor Who story. Not written for fandom, but still.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-22 01:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:20 am (UTC)(link)i hate authors who say they don't like fanfic or who actually tell their fans not to write it. in fact, in general i want all artists i like to keep their unhappy opinions to themselves.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:43 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 06:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 01:11 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 04:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 01:27 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 05:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 09:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)(I'm not pressed abt McKinley's no-fanfic stance though because she's never been nasty about it, I think she was just like 'well my lawyer says it's bad because if I later write a book that resembles a fanfic I could get sued by that author for plagarism or smthing')
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 15:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 12:10 am (UTC)(link)