case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-02 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2343 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2343 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[not a repeat, was too big before]


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Then start transcribing the images yourself? Nobody is stopping you.

Personally I think that is too much to expect of Case, especially when he doesn't even know the fandoms in the pictures half of the time. He's already spending a lot of time running this thing, at some point you just have to accept he cannot offer everything you want without burning himself out in two weeks.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, in theory he could ask for a transcription to be submitted with the secret, which would take care of what I imagine would be the most time-intensive part.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kamino_neko - 2013-06-03 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you wanting F!S in podcast form? Or what else exactly? Honest curiosity.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2013-06-02 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Some things like this have description under the picture.

like for the secret below: "A man in a suit and a slightly confused expression on his face stares off screen to the right. Text reads: My friend blah blah blah." They have programs that will read off the text to them so they can know what the picture is of.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-02 21:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 05:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 22:55 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
alt-text on the secret images, probably.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
They want descriptive text for people who use screen-readers.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Alt text?
sabotabby: (books!)

[personal profile] sabotabby 2013-06-02 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree in theory; in practice, it's a huge task. I wonder if it's a section that could be added and then edited by an army of volunteers.
mekkio: (Default)

[personal profile] mekkio 2013-06-02 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Like the first person to post in each secret volunteers to do a description?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] sabotabby - 2013-06-02 20:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] vethica - 2013-06-02 20:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2013-06-02 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] silverr - 2013-06-02 23:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 04:55 (UTC) - Expand
writerserenyty: (Default)

[personal profile] writerserenyty 2013-06-02 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it would definitely take some effort, perhaps a team of people who generally get to F!S early on, but it would be a nice thing to do if we could work it out.

Transcription

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
[picture is of a black frame, with a person holding onto it. text says: It bugs me that F!S uses pictures of text without descriptions. Blind users can't read them! S!B I don't want to be just That Handicap Nazi forever after. also s!b I cannot art.

Re: Transcription

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 08:18 am (UTC)(link)
Shouldn't that be "secret because" rather than "S!B"? "S exclamation mark B" sounds weird when you actually hear it.

Re: Transcription

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Transcription

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Transcription

[personal profile] totallyradioactive - 2013-06-04 01:46 (UTC) - Expand
sootyowl: (Default)

[personal profile] sootyowl 2013-06-02 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's a good idea, but I don't know how people would go upon doing that. I mean, F!S relies heavily on background images. Would it be better if people did like headers for secrets? Like "Naruto: image contains Sasuke, Sakura, and Sai." Like it would at least give a basis of what's in the picture. Or even always mentioning the fandom would help (but that might ruin a few secrets).

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 20:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 09:18 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm the only asshole here. I don't think there is a need to make a community based on images accessible to people who can't see.

I get the intent to make everything accessible to everyone but I think turning fandom into work is more detrimental than helpful. I would certainly change my mind if it turned out there are thousands of blind people who want to use F!S, but that's statistically unlikely.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-02 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-02 22:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 07:56 (UTC) - Expand
mekkio: (Default)

[personal profile] mekkio 2013-06-02 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Just out out curiosity, how much of a demand is there for transcriptions for blind users in F!S? Are there any blind users? Does anyone know of any blind who would start using F!S if this service were put in place?

(no subject)

[personal profile] vethica - 2013-06-02 21:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-02 21:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-03 10:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 18:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-03 18:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] elaminator - 2013-06-02 21:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] elaminator - 2013-06-03 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] manifold - 2013-06-03 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] totallyradioactive - 2013-06-04 01:49 (UTC) - Expand
feotakahari: (Default)

Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] feotakahari 2013-06-02 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean seriously, isn't this the kind of blatant mockery of other secrets that normally gets a "Take it to comments"? Everyone's responding as if it were a serious secret, and I'm baffled.

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 21:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-02 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-02 21:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-02 22:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-02 22:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-03 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

[personal profile] lunabee34 - 2013-06-03 02:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Wait, isn't this a troll?

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:51 (UTC) - Expand
chardmonster: (Default)

I've actually wanted something like this before

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-06-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't have any visual difficulties (that aren't solved by glasses) but some secrets are flat-out difficult to read due to font and background.

I don't think it'd be difficult to implement this as long as we ask future submitters to also include a transcription of their text--hopefully in most cases this'll be as easy as them cutting and pasting their word walls.

Something simple like

Picture of Sherlock, text: "I have an undying hatred of Benedict Cumberbatch that borders on the fetishistic"

Keep it simple, but useful. There's actually a bot on reddit that transcribes meme pictures somewhat like this.

Re: I've actually wanted something like this before

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 22:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: I've actually wanted something like this before

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 23:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: I've actually wanted something like this before

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-02 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

Can we please not throw the word 'nazi' around so casually

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
??????

1/10

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 05:04 (UTC) - Expand

Personally

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
It bugs the shit out of me to see a picture with text, immediately followed by a description of said picture, with text.

So here's one vote for no.

Re: Personally

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Blind people are stupid.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 01:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 02:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

0/10

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2013-06-03 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 0/10

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 11:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] totallyradioactive - 2013-06-04 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
How about people can add alt text when submitting the secrets, there is an additional comment thread where the descriptions/transcriptions go and volunteers can add them for the secrets that don't have alt text?

That shouldn't be too much additional work for case.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-06-03 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
I have this niggling feeling we had this secret before a few years ago. That or I am completely imagining things.

Either way, if someone wants to volunteer to transcribe I won't stop them. I don't expect Case to do it because he does so much already. If someone wants to put some sort of system in place that would be cool too. I dunno. This is all up in the air right now.

Good luck to those who want to add transcripts.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
"Handicap" and "Nazi" should never be linked as an idea. /)_- Seriously. "something-nazi" is such a poor way to describe anything, and does a terrible disservice to whatever you're championing about.

(no subject)

[personal profile] lynx - 2013-06-03 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-06-03 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
After reading these comments I am grateful for what eyesight I have.

It must really suck to be considered a burden, a cause for extra work because of something you cannot help when you want to enjoy what others are enjoying.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 21:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 21:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-04 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-06-03 05:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hiyami - 2013-06-03 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] making_excuses - 2013-06-03 10:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] manifold - 2013-06-03 16:48 (UTC) - Expand