Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-20 07:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #2453 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2453 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
08. [SPOILERS for Ralph Bakshi's Wizards]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-20 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 01:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
People can complain about the slim chances of their pairing all they want (as long as they are not being hateful).
I don't care if it is an interracial slash pairing or a heterosexual white pairing. Loving a pairing and knowing it is unlikely to happen is disappointing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)(Agree with everything in your post)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 02:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 06:29 am (UTC)(link)BAWWWWWWW. CRY SOME MORE.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 02:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 07:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 01:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 06:30 am (UTC)(link)Secret 6 - Shipping, race, sexual orientation
Yes, it sucks that your interracial (heterosexual) ship probably won't become canon thanks to possibly racist writers but because it's heterosexual there's at least a CHANCE, however small it may be. Try shipping one of those same characters in a pairing that's not only interracial but ALSO slash. It has ZERO chance of ever happening. Stop whining about how unfair it is that your pairing (probably) won't become canon to people whose One True Pairing has even less of a chance of happening than yours does.
Secret because: Shippers of the heterosexual pairing far outnumber those of the slash one. No way am I saying this non-anonymously.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 12:44 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 01:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 05:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 06:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 12:59 (UTC) - ExpandAHAHAHAHAHA
BAW OTHER PEOPLE CAN'T BE SAD BECAUSE I HAVE IT WORSE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW!!!
That stance has never made any sense. It's like telling someone who's pet has died to stop being sad because you lost your grandma. Like. Wut. Grow up.
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 02:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AHAHAHAHAHA
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 13:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AHAHAHAHAHA
Repeat after me
THE CHANCES OF A SHIP BECOMING CANON DOES NOT MAKE IT BETTER OR WORSE!
Sorry I'm not sorry for yelling.
Re: Repeat after me
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Repeat after me
4/10... better luck next time
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 12:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 01:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 15:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 00:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 03:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 04:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 01:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
I wonder how much canon shippers or would-be canon shippers ruin their own fannish experience because they're all biting their nails hoping their ship will be ~validated~ by canon.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 06:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 06:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 13:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 15:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-21 17:36 (UTC) - Expand