Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-24 04:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #2518 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2518 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)And what makes it worse? They changed it to a "magic is a drug" addiction storyline (at least according to rumor) to get money from the Office of National Drug Control Policy, much like the Beer Bad episode. They didn't get money for Beer Bad; not sure if they did for the magic addiction stuff.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)That's the thing about rumors....
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-24 23:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 01:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 03:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 00:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 04:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 07:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-26 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 12:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)So again, agreeing with you.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 12:40 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 03:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)I hated how they torpedoed a character arc that had spanned years, building it up so beautifully, and ended it with the idiotic notion that it was candles and herbs that Willow was hooked on, rather than the power.
+1
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 01:34 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 03:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 05:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-24 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Also, I really, really, really want Alison Hannigan to play a villain in something. Anything. She was so awesome at playing evil Willow!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 11:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 12:33 am (UTC)(link)Why is it that everyone (especially, I've noticed, in this community) thinks that 'the ends justify the means' is automatically immoral? So long as you factor in ALL the consequences of your actions, as well as the intended 'end', and find them to be more good than bad, I don't see why it's so wrong.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 01:38 am (UTC)(link)She didn't even consider the possibility that Buffy would wake up in her coffin.
God, there's so much to dislike about that character when I think about season 6.
no subject
The other, related, main objection is that everyone, depending on their position in society, or their past life experiences, or just their opinions, has different ideas of how to calculate what "more good than bad" is because there's no standardized, easily quantifiable way to measure the objective moral value of one thing vs another thing, so who exactly gets to set the standards for how moral value is measured? And how do you choose who gets to set the standards? There are other objections too but it has already taken several books to voice them all and people still haven't finished.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-25 04:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 11:30 am (UTC)(link)The show muddles it a lot, and it can be legitimately interpreted as that "magic get's you addicted and you do bad stuff" because certainly it was presented like that in the most heavy handed episodes. Certainly they tried to "cure" it through detox.
But that's the thing, magic is not a drug, the addictive thing is the power it grants. Magic itself is neither good or bad, and that's one of the major points of of the Willow miniseries.
So in retrospective, the treatment of magic as a drug makes sense as the explanation "newbies" would came up with, from an in-universe perspective.
So yeah, if you only count the tv series, it is a mumbo jumbo of mixed messages (so yeah, if magics is drugs, there are good drugs!) but the comics really try to explain the inconsistency by the way Willow interacts with magic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-26 01:51 am (UTC)(link)But for me, I'm always going to have the picture of her actually going through physical withdrawal at the end of Wrecked. And for that matter, Willow tripping on the ceiling of the "magic crack" house.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-11-27 10:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)