Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-13 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #3052 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3050 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Falcon Densetsu/F-Zero GP Legends]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

(Stephen Paul Manderson aka Professor Green, Never Mind the Buzzcocks)
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Elysium]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Jeremy Renner]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
It's not like there's not some truth to that, too.
That said, you're going about it wrong: nobody actually sees this and/or cares. All they see is the hypocrisy of judging men for a physical feature they can't change while railing against being judged on your appearance.
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 13:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)Women: how they are treated w/r/t # of sexual partners
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 12:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 09:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 12:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Also what pisses me off is there's a contingent of feminists who refuse to believe that women can do those kinds of things. They believe only men can do them, and if a woman does it, it's only ever because she's under the influence of a man. Which is insulting as hell, because first of all, okay, women aren't fully fledged people, then? They're perfect goddesses? Isn't that pedestal crap one of the things about patriarchy we're trying to fight? And what's more, women are so weak-minded that a man can get them to do anything? Like, seriously, guys, that's what you're implying, so great job with your pro-womannness.
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)I saw a post where these women on Tumblr (which again, should be sensitive times a billion) were applauding this woman for raping a man at gunpoint.
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 01:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 13:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)On the minor end of the scale you see it in fandom where people feel the need to make endless posts about how whoever they hate that week needs to shut up and keep their opinions to themselves, all the while hilariously not realizing that they're being raging hypocrites.
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-13 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 02:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 03:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 03:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:48 (UTC) - Expande_e
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 13:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 02:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 03:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-13 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)I hate how a female character being black automatically means you can't criticize how her romance is written.
Example:
I dislike how Natasha/Bruce and Uhura/Spock were written
They have the same issues for me:
1. They both come out of nowhere with no real build-up
2. Both female characters don't get a plotline of their own and instead end up subsumed in the male's story
With Natasha, LOTS of people will agree with me. Yet if I present the same argument for Uhura, I get accused of being racist and not wanting her near my "white fave."
I'm not saying black women shouldn't enjoy the romance (heck, anyone can -- love what you love) and I get that the historical context is different for black and white women but...
Uhura being black doesn't make the romance better written. Being black doesn't automatically make a character more interesting, especially in a setting like Star Trek which takes place in a post-racial world so they can't even make an interesting plotline from it (for example, by comparing the discrimination Spock faces to that Uhura would face).
Re: Double standards
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:36 (UTC) - ExpandPlayers vs Sluts
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 12:04 am (UTC)(link)women who sleep around are sluts
Take note Renner: call her a player next time.
Re: Double standards
Guy teachers sleeping with underage girl students = "Predator. Pervert. Sex offender!"
I hate that. There are teachers who prey on young boys and yet, they get a pass because they are women and no one sees the boys as victims. But they are.
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 12:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 00:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 01:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 02:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 18:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
I've been working my way through a five-hundred page bookslab about myths regarding child sexual abuse and how it's affected court cases. Thank god it is dry and dense and incredibly boring; otherwise I don't think I could get through it. As it is, I have to put it down every few pages and go play with the cat, or take a walk, or it wrecks my mood ALL FUCKING DAY.
--Rogan
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 02:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 06:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)"me" taking too long in a line for a purchase: geez, why is everyone behind me so impatient, i've got things to to do too, be a little more patient
Re: Double standards
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)