case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-05-08 06:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #3778 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3778 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________


09.






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2017-05-08 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please post as 2nd comment so it collapses!)

Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Some days you come to F!S and it just reminds you that you haven't punched a Nazi today.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't cut yourself on that edge, honeybun.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 09:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 10:21 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 14:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 14:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
What

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Kinda hard when they're all dead. Dummies who insist neo-nazis are the same thing and apply to any and every person they disagree with however.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 12:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 14:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 19:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a feeling you have never punched someone in your life.

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
This is the only day that's reminded of that, or of that I never punched a Nazi in my entire life, or any of the other people I think deserved to be punched or even straight-up fucking murdered.
thewakokid: (Default)

Re: Not related to any actual secret at all, honest.

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-05-09 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
I would very much like it if you and your fellows would stop putting me in the position where I feel I have to defend Nazis.

Based on #3

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
What characters in a pairing you enjoy seem to get the short end of the stick in fanfic?
kaijinscendre: (captain america)

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2017-05-08 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
John Watson is rarely the focus in John/Sherlock fic.

Leonard McCoy is almost never the focus of ANY Star Trek fics regardless of pairing (or gen). Which sucks because he is my favorite. :(

Super specific, but Steve Rogers is rarely the character in a pairing who is the one being cared for. He is generally taking care of Tony or Bucky when shipped. But there are some nice gen fics where Steve is the one being cared for.

Re: Based on #3

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2017-05-08 23:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2017-05-09 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2017-05-09 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2017-05-09 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2017-05-11 23:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on #3

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Lately it's been Adrian Andrews in Franziska/Adrian fics. Damned Ace Attorney fandom lately...

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] el_regrs - 2017-05-09 03:08 (UTC) - Expand
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Based on #3

[personal profile] philstar22 2017-05-09 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Harry Potter tends to get the short end of the stick in terms of characterization in a lot of slash pairings. He's suddenly super submissive and also nothing like canon!Harry. I wish there were more slash fics, even ones pairing Harry with someone older, where he was closer to his canon self.

LoTR crossover

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
For some reason the other day, I was thinking about people eating hobbits. It might have happened in the books once (Lotho... maybe). They'd be fat enough, and not too big. But maybe it would be mean, unless you stuck to eating Sackville-Bagginses.

Then I though, maybe elves would be a better choice, morally. They get reincarnated, so eating one would just be sending it off to a nice life in Valinor. Of course, catching an elf would be difficult, so you'd have to get them to agree to it. Maybe present it as a service. Want to go to Valinor, but you don't have a ship, can't/don't want to build one, and no one will take you? We'll send you there with no fuss, no ships necessary! Sure, there's a stopover in the halls of Mandos, but think how much money you'll save.

But they're probably too big for one person or family, though. But that just means you could sell some of it! Elf sausage, elf bacon, elf-liverwurst, the possibilities are endless.

This made me think of something from an entirely different fandom. A shmoo. Shmoos (or shmoon) can taste like almost any kind of meat depending on how you cook them, they're reproduce asexually and prolifically, and they want to be eaten!

So, anyway, one could possibly make elves fit the role of shmoos. Possibly, you could say it's a moral obligation for them. Do you think this would be a good business in Middle -Earth? Would people buy fried elf or elf-stew or elf sandwiches? How would it taste?

Re: Found the troll!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: LoTR crossover

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think they would eat elves. People generally have a harder time eating animals/creatures they can communicate and be friends with.

Though....dwarves might eat elves.

Re: LoTR crossover

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: LoTR crossover

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
LOL! Did all this thought spring from the "looks like meat's back on the menu" line from the films?

Re: LoTR crossover

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:40 (UTC) - Expand

Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the phrase "I suck at summaries" is a given. What else do you hate to see in summaries?

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
"this is bad don't read", although I think most people using that one are probably kids, so I generally let it go. It does tell me the fic's probably not good, though. And they're fishing for comments.

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

[personal profile] el_regrs - 2017-05-09 03:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

[personal profile] fishnchips - 2017-05-08 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

[personal profile] sarillia - 2017-05-08 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

[personal profile] sarillia - 2017-05-08 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves-----

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

[personal profile] el_regrs - 2017-05-09 10:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fanfic summary pet peeves

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

Sally Yates

[personal profile] mrs_don_draper 2017-05-08 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
So who else watched CNN today? I thought she did a fantastic job today!

Re: Sally Yates

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
Finally watched the long video on Born Sexy Yesterday, for characters who are essentially children in a sexy adult body and their lack of experience with anything is treated as endearing and sexy. It's usually applied to women, like in Splash, or the 5th Element.

And immediately thought of the trope's counterpart, body of a child but mind of an adult.

So my initial thought was, which is creepier? Do you find one ok and one creepy? Both creepy? Both ok? I am curious!

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2017-05-09 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos - 2017-05-09 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] fishnchips - 2017-05-09 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2017-05-09 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] ketita - 2017-05-09 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] feotakahari - 2017-05-09 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 08:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 10:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2017-05-09 01:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Trope vs. Trope

[personal profile] dahli - 2017-05-09 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
????

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What was the closest you were to dying?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Other people must have experienced this too. The WTF moment when you receive an invitation to a pyramid scheme "success seminar" or your ex's wedding.

TW for rape

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TW for rape

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TW for rape

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TW for rape

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: TW for rape

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Weirdest thing you've been invited to?

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 16:53 (UTC) - Expand

Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
the dumbest worries

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 04:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Dumb things you worry about

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 04:28 (UTC) - Expand

Fandoms That You're Disturbed to See NSFW Content For

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Hypocritical? Maybe. But surely everyone has one fandom that they get weirded out by to see porn of.

For me, it's Calvin and Hobbes or Winnie the Pooh. Harvest Moon/Story of Seasons is a bit of a borderline case for me, though there's actual sexual innuendo in some of the games and the dating sim plays a big part in the series, so it makes sense.

APA

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
41°01'30.36" N -78°25'11.64" W