[ SECRET POST #4217 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #603.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

06. https://i.imgur.com/RFIjy3E.png

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, yeah. It isn't being made now and never will be.

[(Anonymous)]

Mission accomplished.

[(Anonymous)]

It probably won't be made, no.

But if that's the choice, if the movie either gets made with Scarlett Johansson or doesn't get made at all, then the question you have to ask is which one of those outcomes is better. And I think there's a strong argument to be made that it's better for the movie not to be made at all.

[(Anonymous)]

Annnnd this is why we can't have nice things.

[(Anonymous)]

What nice things are you thinking of?

[(Anonymous)]

i mean, the fact that scarjo ended up backing out does imply that a public outcry has some force behind it.

but considering that the issue lies with the director, producer, casting coordinator, and a whole set of other people involved in the process, all of whom were apparently fine with casting a cis woman to play a trans man... while i would love to have the movie, i don't think most of the set of people working on it should be anywhere near it. i'd be sad that that movie doesn't happen, but it would probably be sadder if it did.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm wondering where you get the idea that people actually care about your morals.

"Should we focus on entertaining people or forcing a silly agenda for feelies?"

Jeez.

[(Anonymous)]

k

[(Anonymous)]

Well, some people clearly and objectively do care about, or they'd be making the movie

but also, fuck off

[(Anonymous)]

stories about [insert minority here] will be better fucking entertainment if actual [x] are involved with the production

human authenticity and nuance is way more interesting and compelling than the same stereotypical shit with [x] wallpaper slapped on

[morieris]

She was one of the producers.

[(Anonymous)]

i didn't know she did that, that's nice of her

[(Anonymous)]

She was butch, not trans.

[(Anonymous)]

lol wut

[(Anonymous)]

I'm a little dubious, would you mind expanding on that

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, it's a dick move to act like they were definitely trans when... What actually indicates that's the case? Sure, we can't go back in time and ask, but why does that mean we need to assume they WERE trans? Frankly it makes this whole controversy pretty ridiculous, even if the casting choice would've been kinda bad regardless.

[(Anonymous)]

The bullies winning is never good.

[(Anonymous)]

gr8 b8 m8

[(Anonymous)]

What a ridiculous thing to say

[morieris]

How she couldn't have found or made up a role for her to play as a cis-woman while having a trans lead in the role is beyond me. It still could have gotten made, she still could have angled for a supporting actress nom.

Now it just looks like "I'm taking my toys and going home!"

[(Anonymous)]

This makes it sound like she couldn't have won either way tbh. She made a bad decision by accepting the role, yes, but by apologizing and stepping down according to you, she's throwing a tantrum.

[(Anonymous)]

ScarJo looks phenomenal in that photo.

[(Anonymous)]

http://www.noqta.info/file-attachs-63121-100-80.jpg

Those teeth...

[(Anonymous)]

I'm always amazed at how big her boobs arem TBH.