Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-19 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2240 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2240 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - trolls that were a little too obvious; come on, at least don't capitalize the same word in every secret. The others can slide by!].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
But I'm glad you're an expert on people you've never met, it must be a great skill!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I am not saying NO ONE IS EVER LIKE THAT.
I am saying THAT IS NOT THE SITUATION THAT OP IS DESCRIBING.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I mean, yes, that could be what's going on behind the scenes there, but NONE OF THE WORDS IN THAT SECRET are 'my friends are self-diagnosing drama queens who make up their own problems to get attention.' The element of faking was brought in by other commenters.
Sometimes it is depressing to bring basic reading comprehension skills to a thread where no one else seems to bother.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:54 am (UTC)(link)Sometimes it's depressing to have to tell another person that she is drawing conclusions based on her own biases while she is simultaneously whining about people drawing conclusions based on their own biases.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:52 am (UTC)(link)You want to believe that they have actual problems. But, fact is, the situation OP is describing could involve a bunch of attention-seeking fuckers just as easily as it could involve a bunch of people with actual problems who are, unfortunately, discussing said problems with a frequency that is too great for some others to handle.
YOU ARE ALSO FAILING AT LOGIC YOU JACKASS.
no subject
We both agree that some things are unknowable. I am saying "It makes sense to stick to the things that were actually stated by OP and not create assumptions based on other scenarios."
This is not the same logic. It is entirely different logic.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 02:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 09:58 am (UTC)(link)Sensible people will reply: "But having aspergers doesn't give you a free pass to be a jerkass," instead of going "Ohhh well okay then."
People, diagnosed by a doctor or themselves, who claim that aspergers is the reason they're dicks are wrong, and doing a dickish thing. People who jump to the conclusion that aspies are dicks because some people use it as an excuse are also doing a dickish thing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 03:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 03:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 20:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 10:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
a isn't b
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 03:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: a isn't b
So all I'm trying to say is "don't assume people are fakers and don't have legitimate problems" when you have no way of knowing.
Re: a isn't b
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: a isn't b
Re: a isn't b
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: a isn't b
Re: a isn't b
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 04:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: a isn't b
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: a isn't b
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-20 03:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 03:46 am (UTC)(link)The possibility of those with Munchausens and fake accounts are a real problem that, in all fairness, anyone in the OP's position should be aware of. The effects of dealing with these people can be devastating.
I suspect some of the commentors are speaking from experience even if they don't have the correct terminology for it.
I don't think anyone is blaming OP for not having boundaries, they are encouraging the OP to not have guilt in going ahead and setting them.
no subject
Is there a version of Godwin's law that says the first one who calls someone a SJW loses?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 04:15 am (UTC)(link)What does this comment serve except for your lashing out?
Way to make it about all about you.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 10:02 am (UTC)(link)It's not that difficult.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)READING COMPREHENSION, STUPID.
Sounds like you have a problem with people prioritizing their lives.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)That's what anon is saying.