Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-08 03:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #2441 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2441 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)protip: if you read that, ignored the W, and got offended about how anybody could be against social justice at all, you're probably one of them
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 20:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 20:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 22:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 22:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 05:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
Re: Anti-sjws are often just as bad.
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:39 (UTC) - ExpandMy anguish in two sentences
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 22:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 04:29 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)It's just that, you know, I have to deal with misogyny and heterosexism in my real life
and I don't fucking feel like hearing people do nothing but talk about how THIS CANON IS SEXIST OH NOES when I really just want to relax and have fun.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 20:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 20:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 09:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Secret 8 - General fandom
I miss the days when people wanked for hours about which guy the girl should choose or which guy tops in the slash ship or other stupid shit like that. Now all we have is social justice and bitching about other people and other fucking boring shit like that. Am I in the wrong circles? When did we all get so serious?
Re: Secret 8 - General fandom
Re: Secret 8 - General fandom
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)you don't know what you had until you lose it
just you wait, op, something worse will come along and we'll all miss the carefree days of tumblr sjw wank
no subject
I feel like maybe people are more multifannish now and there are fewer people who do fandom just for their one OTP. But that might just be where I hang out?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 20:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 21:43 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 04:27 (UTC) - ExpandHonest answer
The problem here is that the "SJWs" tend not to have much in the way of, well, lives. By that I mean they appear to be, in general, young (hovering around college age or younger) and deeply sunk into internet fandom communities. This is their world. So they care a great deal about, say, whatever show they're obsessively following and will act as if that has the same weight as day to day life because that IS their day to day life.
For example, someone drawing a character as the wrong color is literally the worst racism they have ever personally experienced, so they'll treat it as such.
Re: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 22:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
Re: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 01:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 01:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Honest answer
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 01:06 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-08 23:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
I will say, however, that you can find pointless wank. It's there. It is so very much there. So stretch your legs and take a walk through fandom areas you haven't been before. You'll find it eventually.
WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
Re: WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
Re: WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 12:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THE AWESOMENESS OF THAT BACKGROUND PIC????
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)If you ever need a laugh at a wanky fandom, Supernatural will literally never let you down ever. I've been entertained by years just reading the stuff on F_W.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-09 01:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 12:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 01:22 am (UTC)(link)...you're hanging out in the wrong places, OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 12:23 am (UTC)(link)