Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-14 07:10 pm
[ SECRET POST #2689 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2689 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-14 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 00:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-14 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)I get it; the comics continuity is huge and complicated and contradictory and has a real problem with douchebag gatekeepers. (I apologize for the latter part, and we're working on it.) It is totally okay if you don't want to delve into the fathomless dungeon of crazy that is the Marvel Universe. (It is also okay if you DO want to; we have a lot of fun in our fathomless dungeon of crazy.)
But hey, you don't have to. The MCU is right there, it's brand-new and relatively non-insane, it's designed to be totally accessible, and it's REALLY GOOD. Enjoy it! Use MCU events and characterization, they're terrific! Nobody will be upset at you!
Just don't say you're doing one thing if you're doing the other. That shouldn't be too much to ask.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-14 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 02:43 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-14 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)I think people just might need more explanation on what the various tags mean.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-14 23:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-14 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)The 'all media types' and 'related fandoms' type tags are a bit different, maybe? I've only used 'Doctor Who & Related Fandoms', because for some reason AO3 distinguishes between Classic and NuWho despite them sharing a continuity (well, more or less), and also 'The Hobbit - All Media Types', because I was writing movieverse fic after the first movie but presuming the book ending (which in hindsight may not have been advisable), so I wanted to show both in the tags. So I tagged it 'The Hobbit (Jackson Movies)' and 'The Hobbit - All Media Types' to cover bases. I think those tags probably could be used for fic set in one continuity but drawing elements from another?
Leaving completely aside the advisability of doing that: setting things in one continuity but drawing elements from another, I mean. Sometimes it works, so long as you keep characterisation and canon events consistent with the continuity you're actually working with. I wouldn't include the second continuity as a fandom tag, though, because that signifies crossover to me.
no subject
And not just in that fandom either. The meaning of the word "irritation" takes on a whole new dimension when you've been in the Sherlock Holmes fandom and have tried to filter for non-BBC!Sherlock fanfic.
Ao3 has issues
Yes, but that would be ~tag policing~.
I'm an MCU fan and I'm with you, OP.
no subject
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 01:26 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 03:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 05:47 (UTC) - ExpandOp
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 18:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 18:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 01:51 am (UTC)(link)I mean, I recognize that from a pure numbers perspective, MCU fic overwhelms comics fic, and I do sympathize with your position. Still, I think it's rather hypocritical for you to demand that fusion fic with mostly MCU elements be tagged only as MCU, and that fusion fic with mostly comics elements be tagged both MCU and comics.
(That said. This won't help you with your second problem, but regarding your first, you can exclude fandoms from your search. In the Search within results textbox to the right, type either -"marvel cinematic universe" or NOT "marvel cinematic universe" and hit the Sort and Filter button, and that'll clear out a lot of the fusion fic for you.)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 02:12 am (UTC)(link)Drool on your pillow. No rest behind your eyes. Only nightmares.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 02:30 am (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 06:52 (UTC) - Expandno subject
616 fic with all the movie fic filtered out.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-15 07:01 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 04:04 am (UTC)(link)People don't get the AO3 system. All of these tags are linked, so if someone does search the pairing under a different phrasing than you used, it will still go to the same place. You're not going to get any more hits by using every possible ship name.
So yeah, I feel you, op (and I've had the same problem you're having re multiple canons being mixed up too, in other fandoms though). I wish people would take the time to read the ao3 tag faq, or that ao3 would send a copy to each new user, even. Standardisation would be such an improvement.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-15 05:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
And yeah, if you're writing in adaptation!verse, with adaptation!verse characterizations, and cherry-picking details from the source material to throw in, that's fine--hell, I'm outlining CA:TWS sequel fic that's specifically designed to make people who've read the comics think they know what's about to happen and then shit themselves when it doesn't--but you're still writing in adaptation!verse.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)