Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-29 07:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #2704 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2704 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
no subject
That, and I'd find it morally iffy to actually have sex with someone who doesn't know who he is, if we're being realistic here. I mean, if you see the dynamic between him and Pierce - he's more child-like and obedient when not in active mode.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 02:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 02:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 04:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: AYRT
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 02:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 04:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 05:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 17:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 19:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 21:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 21:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 00:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 01:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 01:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 02:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 07:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 04:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 16:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 17:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
Re: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 19:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Bit OT. Ok, lot OT.
no subject
-pukes everywhere-
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:36 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 12:59 am (UTC)(link)oh yes
Me too.
no subject
no subject
So much about Bucky is basically fucked up, but I like it, and part of me enjoying that on a fandom level is navigating just how much fucked-upness I can take.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 02:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 04:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 06:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 03:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
"Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Also, reading the comments from above, I vote for an AU where the Winter Soldier, instead of going into kill-mode goes into SEXGOD-mode. Then he's all sexy and not childlike, etc. Win-win!
Re: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 02:14 am (UTC)(link)They do this by programming him to seduce the target. The Soldier reacts to situations only because he's been told to and…yeah.
I hate myself for wanting it, but I do. :(
Re: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 04:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 21:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:03 am (UTC)(link)BUT...given your AU SEXGOD-mode Winter Soldier, I'd want him to take me to places I've never been before, perhaps OP does too. SEXGOD's knowledge and prowess > regular human sexiness = damn right fuck me, take me to new heights, make me feel like I've never felt before.
I could totally be wrong, but someone taking you to pleasure might feel nice, as opposed to you doing for them (although I feel in real life it should be a two way street). That is all.
Re: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:56 am (UTC)(link)But fuck/be fucked by can differentiate the penetrative/penetrated dynamic in sex. If I'm reading that right, the OP wants to take the receptive role. As opposed to, you know, being a Hydra higher-up who's nailing Winter Soldier. Or something along those lines.
Re: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 05:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 06:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: "Be fucked by"?
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandLiking your idea
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:50 am (UTC)(link)TWS sounds like a much more interesting fictional fuck than Bucky does. Consent issues and all. (I like my bad!wrong straight-up dark, and this sounds like something I could get into.)
Need Comic Natasha/Winter Solider smutty recs and to agree with the OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 03:56 am (UTC)(link)I need comic book Natasha/Winter Solider sex like burning, because I know they would be so hot together. Please help meeeeeeee!
Re: Need Comic Natasha/Winter Solider smutty recs and to agree with the OP
Re: Need Comic Natasha/Winter Solider smutty recs and to agree with the OP
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 05:54 (UTC) - Expandx . x
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: x . x
Re: x . x
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-31 02:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: x . x
Re: x . x
(Anonymous) 2014-05-30 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not offended at all. I found the debate interesting and intriguing (big meta fan!).
...Still want to be thrown on a bed and taken by the Soldier, though.
no subject
Plus this whole film was just... all the fight choreography was really, uncomfortably hot. It's like they took the "film the sparring like it's a sex scene" principle from Pacific Rim and applied it to all-out brutal stabbing and murderpunching. The violence was so intensely sexual that now I want all of it remixed as violent sex.