Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-08-13 03:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #3510 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3510 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Stephen King]
__________________________________________________
03.

[John Green]
__________________________________________________
04.

[American Gods]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Charlie Hunnam in King Arthur: Legend of the Sword]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Penn & Teller: Fool Us]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Steven Universe]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Questionable Content]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Ghostbusters 2016]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #502.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[Ghostbusters 2016]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 12:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I mean, you're obviously a troll, but your internal logic is inconsistent.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)op
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 04:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 05:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:47 (UTC) - Expandop again
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)imo
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:51 (UTC) - Expandop
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 02:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 04:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 18:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
Re: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)There was also a lot of nostalgic bitterness. I mean, it's hard to remake a Bill Murray movie. I loved the original Ghostbusters, and I loved this too.
I'd probably be like FUCK THIS if someone remade Four Weddings and a Funeral so I do get it, but Ghostbusters is a toy-selling action comedy franchise and it's gonna happen.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-13 20:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-13 21:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-13 20:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-13 21:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 02:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 04:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 02:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 17:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)You "judge movies for themselves" but your taking a stand against the movie that "deleted comments".
...wtf? who deleted comments? the PR people? what kind of simplistic bullshit is this??
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-13 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 02:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 04:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 07:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 01:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 01:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 05:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 03:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 08:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 16:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 00:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 02:26 am (UTC)(link)This whole idiocy started because a few misogynists decided that they hated the film because 'Ew! Women's cooties'. From there, it all just snowballed. The studio got involved and made it their agenda, people with legitimate criticism got involved saying their voice wasn't being heard.
So, for me, what came out of this was it all began because of that small percentage of asswipes on the net. Why aren't more people angry with them? Why aren't people saying 'Wow this whole thing got out of hand because of the actions of a very small group of misogynists? We should totally call them out because they're making any legitimate criticism of this film almost impossible to talk about'.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 02:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 02:51 am (UTC)(link)but sure... it's about ethics in journalism!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 05:58 (UTC) - ExpandIt's a great film
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 03:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 04:18 am (UTC)(link)Yes, sure, legit criticism like vile insults to the cast and racial slurs.
As a feminist you should support other women who try to do their job and get tons of hate just for being women. How many reboots are being done lately and how many of them get this shitstorm of hate?
As a feminist, supporting this movie is a political stand. Besides, it´s not as if it´s horrible. It´s nice and fun, so go watch it.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:43 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I was completely indifferent to the original movie so really enjoying the new movie was a bonus.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 10:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)I still have no idea what movie they're confusing with the old ghostbusters.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 19:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 20:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 19:50 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-15 04:45 (UTC) - Expand