Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-15 06:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #3816 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3816 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[iZombie]
__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #546.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
Same goes for younger comedians. And female comedians. They're all jerks. Every one of them. They all to a person hold some jerkish or outdated or """Wrong""" opinion.
My advise? You probably don't want to her it but I've stopped looking for people who aren't jerks, and just enjoy what makes me laugh.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)I guess it's easier to argue with someone if you try to turn their opinion into some extreme, black-and-white thing, by implying that they consider anyone they disagree with on anything at all to be a jerk.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)That isn't "advice" (not "advise"), it's just what you do.
I guess the advice is that OP should do the same, but it sounds like the jerks might not actually make them laugh.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)That's not to say that you should hold creators to an idealized standard, by any means, and it's every individual person's choice how they want to approach the question of how those ideals work in reality. But this kind of false equivocation is a complete distraction from any reasonable approach to that idea. Yeah, everyone's a jerk on some level, but that doesn't mean you can't cut someone off if someone is consciously and intentionally being a jerk, in a way that you personally find distasteful. Fucking ridiculous.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 12:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)It's not universally true but I think it definitely is statistically common enough to where it's a fair generalization.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 04:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 04:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Eddie Murphy can be hrk.
Even old Chris Rock can be awkward (though his outfits are hilariously bad and fun to just stare at).
I read an article that talked about female stand-up and this case- not aging with the shifting social norms. Apparently Sarah Silverman is a (maybe not good. Ok? decent?) example at adjusting with norms instead of just trying to power through them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 05:32 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 12:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 20:50 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-15 23:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 05:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 04:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 06:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)https://youtu.be/_4ryPZW06EY
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)I don't really see what's wrong with your current course of action.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 05:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-15 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 04:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 12:03 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 00:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-16 04:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-16 04:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
https://youtu.be/8WBCsiCqIAs?t=2m27s