Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-07-07 03:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #4203 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4203 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)There's just kind of... no real satisfying answer here, unless it's "only discuss fandom with people that you know to be reasonable".
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)I'm just like... yes, and? You don't believe things exist unless you personally witness them? You don't believe fandom can be this this argumentative? (A big HAHAHA to that last one.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)It's not entirely rational. If I had a dollar for every time I've seen a discussion right here on FS get weird because User A said something fairly innocuous about [insert character here] and User B jumps in with a big chip on their shoulder ready to fight because lots of other people on the internet (but not, it should be pointed out, User A) have said nasty things about [insert character here], I'd could treat myself to a nice steak dinner. People aren't always reacting to what's right in front of them, they're reacting to other arguments made elsewhere on the internet as though those faraway arguments are right in front of them.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-07 22:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-07 22:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 02:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 11:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 22:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 10:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-09 04:51 am (UTC)(link)Clearly, you've never been in Marvel fandom.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)I kinda made this distinction in the GTA V secret a couple of days ago, but a lot of the times female characters are written very unfavorably from a male perspective. Perhaps not even intentionally, but as to better serve the needs of a "gritty" story that requires the main character (male) be in a dysfunctional/failing relationship (with a female character). Both characters will wind up doing bad things to each other, but the main character needs to be sympathetic and the POV so at the end everything they'll do will be sympathetic, but no writing will be spared to make sure the other character (female) will get the level of justification/sympathy.
Like pretty much I don't see it as a character issue, more of a writer's issue that skimps out on making female characters with as much depth and good writing as male characters. Like sure you could go out and lambast the female character as much as you want, but what's the point? Characters are just words on the script written by writers and staff. They're not actual people, and bad writing makes it even more apparent how much effort they're given (or lack of) when it they don't act like real human beings.
Of course that goes for stuff where the writers didn't care/think about giving female characters the same amount of effort as male characters. If you're talking about stuff like Umineko where female characters are indeed given the same amount of effort as male characters, and indeed some are written to be very hateable on purpose (note: this is counteracted by the author actually making them well-rounded and giving them understandable human motivations instead of being evil for the lolz), then go ahead?
tl;dr - badly written female characters are often products of lazy writers, but people on the internet don't recognize that, and use the opportunity to be strangely misogynistic about real human beings.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 09:14 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 11:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)spicy
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 03:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)It just sucked, because I had about equal male and female character favorites and so often the female ones were bashed or ignored in favor of male characters. It became really really tiresome. (And was a big reason I mostly left fandom.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-07 23:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 01:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 02:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 15:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-07 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 00:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 02:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 01:32 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 02:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-07-08 02:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-07-08 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)