Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-01-19 07:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #1843 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20. [broken]
__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29. [broken]
__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

__________________________________________________
41.

__________________________________________________
42.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #263.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 12:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 01:02 am (UTC)(link):D
no subject
I do read Sherlock/John fics though, but really I don't ship them in the show, just find the fics facinating, same with Sherlock/any other pairing including 3 and 4-somes, only fandom where I don't really care about any ships at all...
no subject
And why is it not okay for men to be more than just friends?
And to the thread OC, what the fuck about becoming a couple "takes away" from a friendship? Excuse me? I'd love to hear the explanation on this, since I'm currently dating and completely in love with the girl who has been my best friend for years. Please, explain how my loving her and being in a relationship with her takes away from our friendship.
no subject
Torchwood had quite a bit of gayness, but that is not enough, in a perfect world there would be more gay characters and different ethnicity and more female leading roles, and maybe one day we will.
And I wish you and your girlfriend all the happiness in the world!
no subject
I really wish shows would include more gay and lesbian characters-- and of course, more women and minority characters as well. It infuriates me when I see a new show come out with an all-white, mostly male, all-straight cast. Ugh. It's one part of why I would love it so much if Sherlock went that route -- though of course not the only reason, lol.
Thank you very much! :) I hope you got that that part of my comment was directed at the OC of the thread, not you.
no subject
So me not wanting Sherlock and John to become canon is not me being homophobic it is just my opinion nor is wanting most of my bff relationship on tv to stay just that, bffs. I ship both slash and straight relationships, I have both straight and gay friends, just like I have friends of both gender and different ethnicity, the thing is though that I don't want to see people making out if the couple is gay or not is irrelevant, public displays of affection makes me uncomfortable, but that has to make me homophobic right?
And for the record I did not see comment as you put it "gross, slightly homophobic", I just saw it as something I agreed on, but you see it differently and if I offended you with that I am sorry.
I got that, still wont stop me from being nice...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 03:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 21:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 03:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 02:06 am (UTC)(link)I'm not saying you can't be in a relationship with your best friend. I'm saying that in the case of these particular characters, I don't think their love has to be romantic to be powerful. If they turned them into a couple I feel it would take away the point of their relationship. Again, I'm thinking more along the lines of Frodo and Sam than just any fictional male BFFs. I'm sorry if I'm not explaining myself well. It's late and I'm tired.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 02:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Please explain how and why.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 05:53 am (UTC)(link)He and John obviously love and depend on each other, more than anyone else, but to me they're relationship is like that of two brothers. If they were a couple it would be a different dynamic and imo out of character for Sherlock.
If you see them as a couple then great, but I think it's better left as something to interpret than made canon and that doesn't make me homophobic.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 05:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
You said that making their relationship canon would "take away" from their friendship. I said, I got in a relationship with my best friend, does that mean it "took away" from our friendship? What, exactly, does a romantic relationship "take away" from a friendship?
And what is the "point" of their relationship that would be taken away if they became a couple? Please tell me, I'm dying to know.
You haven't explained anything. All you've done is make yourself look like a homophobe who doesn't like the idea of two men hooking up on your television.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 03:13 am (UTC)(link)I admit that post was poorly worded. What I meant was that some people seem to view any affection or special bond between best friends, (whether it's two men, two women or a man and a woman), as some sort of proof that they secretly want to sleep with each other, and there can be no other explanation. The reason I referred primarily to the two men scenario is because from my experience it's more common than the two women scenario. As another example, I feel the same way about Harry and Hermione. Their friendship is one of my favourite things about Harry Potter, and I wouldn't want that to be changed. Of course friends can develop feelings for each other but that isn't always the case. I guess it's not so much the idea itself that bothers me as the people who shove it down your throat that these two characters are DEFINITELY in love with each other and if you feel differently you're an idiot or a homophobe.
To me putting Sherlock in a romantic relationship with John is like putting The Doctor in a romantic relationship with one of his companions. I just don't agree with it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 06:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 06:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 07:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 18:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-20 21:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 01:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 01:16 am (UTC)(link)I mean they never show them as being friends or anything, no way.
no subject
Except in everything ever.
Seriously, I want a list of this supposed overwhelming number of TV shows where the main characters are men and in a relationship.
They sound like the kind of shows I'd like to watch.
no subject
no subject
Off the top of my head: Psych, Criminal Minds, Being Human (presumably both versions, though I only have personal experience with the UK version), The West Wing, House MD... would you like me to go on? These are all shows with "honest to god close friendships between two men." I could probably name a dozen more given a little time.
Close friendships between two men are all over the frigging place in television. They're not rare, they're not unheard-of. Period.
no subject
Besides which, these days, bromance is practically de rigeur for sitcoms. C.F. Community, Cougar Town (done by the same showrunner as Scrubs, the origin of "Guy Love"), How I Met Your Mother, Happy Endings... that show and the dramedy in my icon, Sirens, subvert it by having one member of the bromance actually be gay, but they're still platonic relationships. Also currently popular are dramas that explore familial or faux-familial bonds between men, like Supernatural and the marvelous Breaking Bad (where the two MCs form a surrogate father/son relationship).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-21 01:23 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 02:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 04:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 08:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 11:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 13:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-21 05:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I am disappoint. :(