Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-08-09 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2046 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2046 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #292.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - spam secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)Glad I'm not a frequent visitor to that person's blog and/or their friend, negl.
no subject
Warm
Still, I like this secret for its discussion potential.
no subject
no subject
Way back in the seaQuest days I read this fic that was like 90% OCs and it was AWESOME. I actually re-read it now and then because I just love all the OCs so much.
So yeah, I admit I skip over a lot of OC fic but also admit there are some really great OCs floating around out there.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 21:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 00:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 21:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-11 09:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 01:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)OC's are fine and sometimes necessary for the most part. But quit pairing them up with canon characters! It's just annoying and seems self-insertish. :/
no subject
So I'm not sure where your assumption is coming from, exactly. Can you explain that one to me?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
For example, I read a hilarious story that was about how bizarre it was to date John Watson. It's one of the funniest things I've ever read, it was hardly romantic at all, and it was narrated by an OC. Passing it by just because it was OC/John Watson would have meant that I really missed out.
You're free to not like it though, I suppose, but I really don't understand why you're so enraged. I've spoken before about fandom entitlement, and this is a prime example of it. People will make what they make. Sifting through things is not that hard. And if you don't like what's out there, then write what you do like.
People shouldn't make misleading tags, but it's really not that hard to sift for a little while for something good.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I mean, like (picking random big fandom), what it's like to live a few doors down from Nick Fury or something.
Or what the life of Loki's hairdresser is like.
Or if the story is some epic battle between larger-than-life kings, what Joseph the random peasant thinks of it all and how he copes.
That kind of thing.
Those kinds of stories you really can't tell without creating a character (well, I guess you could reassign those things to an existing obscure character, but you're still mainly creating, I'd say.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 21:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 03:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I also feel this way about OC babies and family. It's like someone is trying to mash up what they think are the best traits of their favourite pairing or character, and create a SUPER combo/extension everyone will totally love for certain amirite. Even the adopted ones. It gets very Renesmee-feeling, cgi baby/face included.
no subject
Oh noez, people think you have a "strong opinion" because you can't keep yourself from generalizing.
no subject
But I usually only like OC's in "see the fictional world from the eyes of someone else" type stories where the focus isn't on the canon characters at all.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But I don't get why you are so obviously angry about people doing what they like to do. Fandom is for having fun and if these writers want to create characters for whatever reason at all and they're having fun, it's not a personal attack on you.
Also, I'd be curious about your feelings on the insertion of semi-canon character (ex. the cellist from the Avengers movie). He/she is mentioned, is canonically in a relationship with a canon character, but we know NOTHING about them. Does that qualify for you as an OC/canon pairing that will make you tear your hair out?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Anyway I don't know why you felt the need to make this a secret: it's a pretty popular opinion, as you can see.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 01:16 am (UTC)(link)Then again, it's for an incredibly small fandom anyway so no1curr.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 02:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm reading a Steve Rogers/OC right now that I actually am really enjoying.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 22:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
it doesn't matter if OC is trying to help CC/CC get together or teach them life lessons with its superior wisdom or w/e. in fact, it only makes it worse.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Preach!
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 03:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 04:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 04:50 (UTC) - ExpandThese are all in a folder marked "and then NPH was born"
Re: These are all in a folder marked "and then NPH was born"
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 05:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 06:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 06:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 06:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 07:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 08:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 08:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-13 01:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 08:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 13:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-10 20:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-08-14 21:35 (UTC) - Expand