case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-10 03:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2231 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2231 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know how I feel about your overall sentiment but I will say Weeds definitely got ridiculous with Nancy's magic vagina. It wasn't her sleeping around that bothered me but how she managed to get out of life threatening situations because for some reason everyone wants to bang her.

Weeds really should have ended several seasons before it did though, Nancy had better writing in the beginning.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You sound Catholic.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
CATHOLICISM INVENTED CHASTITY/FIDELITY/JUST PLAIN NOT SLEEPING WITH THAT MANY PEOPLE

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] magpiestar - 2013-02-11 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 05:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

SA IMPORTANT NOTE

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] inkmage - 2013-02-11 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kryss_labryn - 2013-02-11 15:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] mekkio - 2013-02-10 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 13:59 (UTC) - Expand
author_by_night: (Default)

[personal profile] author_by_night 2013-02-10 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Most Catholics I know are... not prudes. If that's what you're trying to imply here.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thinkatory - 2013-02-10 22:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] truxillogical - 2013-02-10 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2013-02-12 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wauwy - 2013-02-11 08:43 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah, OP sounds Mormon.

The Catholics I know are constantly sleeping around.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:58 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Meh, I feel the same way. That happens usually at the point where the writers can't come up with anything else, and the whole thing escalates to the Bold and the Beautiful levels, where the main character has hit it off with everyone and their brother (and father), sometimes repeatedly.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, there's a difference between sex-as-plot-point vs sex-for-no-reason-except-to-make-the-character-seem-"liberated." I also find it kind of aggravating that the only female characters who are ever described as "in charge of her own sexuality" are the ones who have lots of meaningless casual sex with everything that moves. Female characters who sleep only with their partners, or are celibate, or only have sex when it's supposed to be meaningful for them, are never described that way.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] silverau - 2013-02-10 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] truxillogical - 2013-02-10 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

+infinity

[personal profile] elephantinegrace - 2013-02-10 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] atgdng - 2013-02-11 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-14 09:12 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Being promiscuous isn't a 'bad decision', thank you very much. As long as I use protection, who gives a shit if I've slept with most of my acquaintances? I'm not hurting anyone.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 21:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP here

[personal profile] sachiko_san - 2013-02-11 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wauwy - 2013-02-11 08:50 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
i know just what you mean, OP. annoys the hell outta me, too.
skeletal_history: (Default)

[personal profile] skeletal_history 2013-02-10 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't you hear, OP?

(no subject)

[personal profile] supermanda - 2013-02-11 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah....Best stay away from anything written by Steven Moffat.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-10 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Kind of gross to see so many people here defending a slut-shaming asshole.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2013-02-12 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 03:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 02:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 03:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 13:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2013-02-11 19:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 23:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 18:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wauwy - 2013-02-11 08:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2013-02-12 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-12 01:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wauwy - 2013-02-11 08:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 13:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 21:20 (UTC) - Expand
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2013-02-10 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh wow I totally misread this comment as "I hate it when shows show character development by making a promiscuous character LESS promiscuous as time goes on," a la Barney from How I Met Your Mother.

Bitch n' moan indeed.
bored_bitch: (Garrus_dungiveafuck)

[personal profile] bored_bitch 2013-02-10 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I just want more "strong" female characters that don't need sex or romance, period.

Not because of some kind of dumb "sworn to celibacy" shit, but just because it plain doesn't interest them.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-10 22:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] mekkio - 2013-02-10 23:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bored_bitch - 2013-02-11 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 01:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 02:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bored_bitch - 2013-02-11 02:57 (UTC) - Expand
yeahscience: (Default)

[personal profile] yeahscience 2013-02-10 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
This is one reason I was fond of Homeland season one, where Carrie was both a strong woman in charge of her own sexuality and shown to have made some really terrible choices of partners/situations.

God, I miss you, Homeland season one.
author_by_night: (Default)

What I think the OP meant

[personal profile] author_by_night 2013-02-10 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think the OP meant "OMG people have sex with more than one person." That's not the impression I got at all. I think what OP meant was "I hate when for a character to be strong, all they have to do is have sex with every single character." That's not holding prudish views, that's thinking a female character's strength should come from more than having lots of sex.

The OP wasn't insulting sex. They were talking about sex being all that supposedly matters.

Re: What I think the OP meant

[personal profile] inkdust - 2013-02-11 04:30 (UTC) - Expand
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-02-10 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my goodness. This will not end well.



Cleverly done, though. I must admit. ...unless this was an accident. In which case, don't let us know. The beauty is in the mystery.
Edited 2013-02-11 00:03 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
There's nothing wrong with a strong female character enjoying sex and having a lot of it and flaunting her sexuality, but when that gets to be the only way that writers think a female character can be strong, it's a problem, yeah.
Especially since promiscuous female characters have a nasty habit of having romantic subplots where the love interest needs to "tame" her, ugh.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
What is it about sexual activity that makes people feel like any defense of a behavior other than their own is an attack on their own behavior?

(no subject)

[personal profile] darkmanifest - 2013-02-11 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 01:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 05:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 13:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-11 13:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Damn, so many people missing the point here!

For what it's worth, I agree with you, OP. It's sad that sometimes writers get lazy.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
Image
wauwy: (:()

[personal profile] wauwy 2013-02-11 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
But what about Captain Kirk and Iron Man getting slutshamed??

Also you really should know that everyone can see your photobucket identity when you post a url like this.

Am I the only one who notices this

(Anonymous) 2013-02-11 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Having sex with anyone in the cast to show how "liberated" and what a "strong female character" she is.

Isn't this something that countless Mary Sue OCs do in fanfiction...and we as readers tend to mock them for it. But when an actual show does it, and someone comments that they think it's a stupid way to show someone's "strength of character" a bunch of people come to yell at them for slutshaming.

Odd
htebazytook: (Default)

[personal profile] htebazytook 2013-02-12 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Huh and here I'd thought sexual promiscuity usually symbolizes insecurity in fiction