Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-04-26 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3035 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3035 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #434.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)If I write a post about an issue I have with a character (say, Tony Stark for instance), I really don't get why people get so angry that I tagged it as "Tony Stark."
That is literally the most relevant tag and I want to be able to find my posts about Tony Stark all under one tag.
If you don't like it, then don't keep reading and don't reblog. Simple right?
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)People need to learn to scroll and not take their fandoms so personally.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)I was more thinking of the people who try to bully others into not tagging their rants, because that bothers me.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-26 21:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
Get over it.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-27 02:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-27 07:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-27 23:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-28 00:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-27 05:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
Re: Fandom Etiquette
i.e #filler #filler2 #filler3 #placeholder #lastone #thatcharacterIhatecoughdaudcough
Eta: Ah I see you've been told about it, never mind
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-27 05:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-05-01 08:17 am (UTC)(link)I guess I don't like seeing "clutter" on specific Tumblr tags. I wanna spend my Tumblr procrastination time actually focused on something I care about, not scrolling past unconstructive hate posts.
And the "it's for my own blog's organization" excuse doesn't really work because they could just add five filler tags before the organization tag, then they could find it on their blog but it wouldn't show up on the main tag. Or even better, tag it "#anti [something]" and/or "#[something] hate", then other people who want to find criticism or hate of the thing, could find THAT easily, AND it wouldn't clutter the main tag...
Re: Fandom Etiquette
I mean, why do (general) you need to tag a post like that? You're clearly not looking for a thoughtful discussion of this character's flaws or a dialogue about the writing or whatever. And is it really that important to you to organize all the times you called the character a slut under one neat link on your blog? /2cents
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)Why would you assume this?
I'm not gonna lie, as someone who is a huge fan of a character that is loathed and regularly gets torn to pieces by fandom (Anakin Skywalker if you're wondering) I just find that people use "don't tag your hate" as an excuse to silence dissenting opinions.
If I were tagging it with say "Tony Stark love" or a positive tag, I'd completely agree with you. But why is the general tag reserved for only positive comments?
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-26 21:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-26 21:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-26 21:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
I assume that because I've seen enough arguments that started with someone responding to one of those posts. Usually it goes like this:
A: "Char is such a bitch. I wish she would die already."
B: *in an offended tone* "Why do you think that?"
A: "Numbered list of things Char has done wrong; and also why are you responding to my post. Free speech etc."
B: "Numbered counter-arguments; and also free speech doesn't mean you're not wrong, because you are, personal insult."
*rapid descent into more personal insults that somehow ends with both parties thinking they're being the reasonable one*
I don't think the general tag should be reserved for positive comments only. There's a middle ground between uncritical love ("This character is perfect and can do no wrong") and hate ("She's a slut and needs to die.") I actually think you could have a very interesting discussion about how one character I often see referred to as a slut seems to view sex as a currency. I just really don't think that someone who calls her a slut and wishes for her death is looking to have that discussion.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-26 21:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)Like some people really don't care and will do things to purposely antagonize, so it's better to not blame the whole fandom for it.
I still don't like the "get rid of haters" attitude because I find more often it's directed at ANYONE with any sort of negative opinion, but I understand how liking something unpopular can get exhausting, I've had that issue myself but I just tend to ignore it.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
Because Tony Stark is a real person and would be sad to find your rant when he reads his own tag?
Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Etiquette
(Anonymous) 2015-04-27 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Also some people do put warnings up, I do in my fandom because I know people have been particularly sensitive about rants so I don't want to deal with anyone who says I don't warn for it (I still put my stuff in the regular tags, but I also tag for the critique aspect of it.)
Re: Fandom Etiquette
a) Most people (at least in the spaces I was in back when I was on Tumblr on a regular basis) were posting criticism, not hate. Though of course it may be perceived as such by a character's stans.
b) The few trolls who were posting actual hate were doing it to piss people off, so why would they warn?
and
c) "Tony Stark Hate" isn't something, like non-con or character death, that's a widely recognized trigger that needs to be warned for.
Re: Fandom Etiquette
Re: Fandom Etiquette
though I still agree with you tbh