Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-08 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3292 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3292 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
http://i66.tinypic.com/ridkc7.png
no subject
Because, I really hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I sincerely doubt anyone is going to care if you're leaving reviews telling them their porn is problematic.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-08 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Newsflash: you don't 'need' to leave flames on anything. And you are not responsible for choosing which tropes need to disappear and which should be permitted to stay.
Is this a troll secret?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:09 am (UTC)(link)It reminds me of the passive aggressive "friendly reminders" on tumblr.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Now go be even less of an asshole than that. You can do it!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:53 am (UTC)(link)MTE
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 02:06 am (UTC)(link)or hadn't found the filter for the adult-rated fics yet)....I really wish I'd had the example of MLP before me to inspire me to be less of an asshole. 15 years on, the remembrance of my shame is great.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 03:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 09:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Because yeah, that was kind of the point.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Example.
"What a disappointing fic. This took Middle Earth and completely erased its magic for the sake of making the fic darker and "gritty".
Your ableist caricature of the unnamed dwarf woman was downright disgusting. Rather than using magic to explain Bilbo needing food or cleaning, you use a disabled character. Dwarves have a canonical sign language and she easily could have communicated what was going on (being half blind would not prevent her from knowing sign language, though she likely would have had to use fingerspelling). Claiming that she would starve without that work is wrong; Bifur proves that dwarves can be disabled and still a part of dwarf society. In fact, it is very likely that dwarves live in a work-or-you-don't-eat society. Up until then, she would have had to have had work lest she die, likely something far different. Did you ever piece that together, or did you only just put her together while writing? You also used an ableist slur to describe her.
If this was meant to hold a gritty way of saying rape is wrong, then you did not reach its full potential. It only came at the very end. This kind of work is by no means original, even with men as protagonists. A number of white cisgender, heterosexual men have actually managed to convey the theme quite well from a male perspective (while seeking help from women on their work to make it accurate). Even other fan works have done it better (I saw something on disneykink like this a long time ago that managed to portay the message of what was wrong with the protagonist without being ableist and held the rape is wrong message much better).
In terms of second point of view perspective, it ultimately seemed to work against the "feminist" message. (This is not to imply anything against the second person point of view as it can be quite enjoyable, and it has been used in works to show that abuse is wrong in other forms)."
This was posted on Only Her Sonorous Jewels by Hlessi, a Hobbit au that uses the second person well and is purposefully written like a dark fairy tale.
Reading this all I could think is, what an asshole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 12:47 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 01:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 01:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 01:34 am (UTC)(link)Really, 95% of all (OOC or not) trends I used to notice on chat or paragraph based rps were entirely ripped off fanfic, to the point that it's becoming a second canon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 01:40 am (UTC)(link)Really, this whole thing reeks of "stop liking what I don't like".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 02:23 am (UTC)(link)If they aren't, then by all means ask (ask, not demand) for a label to be slapped on the fic, but it's still not your solemn duty to fuss at other people for liking what you don't like.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 02:53 am (UTC)(link)Back in 1996 we had fanfic writers who would actively shame other fanfic writers for writing smut at all. Now we have this. *shrugs*
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 04:12 am (UTC)(link)Keep enjoying your inability of distinguish reality and fiction if that's what make you happy!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 07:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 09:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 17:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 02:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 09:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 17:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 05:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 09:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 09:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 14:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 00:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 00:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 02:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 17:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 18:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 00:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 08:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 16:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 01:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-09 20:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 02:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-01-10 03:50 (UTC) - Expand