Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-06-30 06:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #3831 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3831 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for OITNB SEASON 5]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Wonder Woman]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for OITNB]
[WARNING for torture]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #548.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:28 (UTC) - Expande_e
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 03:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 11:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 10:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:06 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)Besides, even in other fields where education and experience matters and there is far less expectation of natural talent, logging a certain number of years doesn't necessarilly make you better at your job than someone who has logged somewhat fewer years, and lucky breaks (and things like nepotism) happen all the time.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 10:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:38 (UTC) - ExpandOy.
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 03:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 04:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 12:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 14:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 10:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-06-30 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 11:53 (UTC) - ExpandLynda Carter wasn't build like a brick house either...
https://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/lynda-carter-gal-gadot-wonder-woman-105871.jpg
Re: Lynda Carter wasn't build like a brick house either...
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Lynda Carter wasn't build like a brick house either...
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Lynda Carter wasn't build like a brick house either...
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 04:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 01:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Presumably, that's what happened here. Good for the casting director for taking a leap of faith.
+1
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 10:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 11:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)Gal Gadot trained for the part. Some actors end up doing really unhealthy stuff to look right, like Hugh Jackman who really wanted to be done with having to look right for Wolvering (and even he looks way more jacked in later films than he did in the first one). I'm glad she wasn't pushed to doing potentially unhealthy things for the role.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-06-30 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)Let's not pretend that the reason was she was cast instead of a muscular-looking woman was because the filmmakers were trying to be inclusive towards women who don't bulk up when they work out.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 12:02 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 01:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 02:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 01:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 03:17 am (UTC)(link)I agree that im a casting sense, being a "looker" is not the most important aspect of that. The aspect of Aphrodite, found in women in general, reflects an ordinary beauty. But acting ability is of great importance. Gadot is about the right height, about the right look, and has shown a facility as an actress in general and in action movies. I think you're going to have to relax. Movies are often cast with someone seen in other movies.
It was planned to be Sandra Bullock twenty years ago, and that would have been something. I can deal with it being Gal Gadot.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 03:51 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 06:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 11:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 20:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 11:00 am (UTC)(link)http://cdn2us.denofgeek.com/sites/denofgeekus/files/styles/article_width/public/2016/03/wonder_woman_chronicles.jpg?itok=IlMQt9KM
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/15/Wonder_Woman_Trinity_Vol_2_4.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d0/Hippolyta_%28DC_Comics%29_as_WW_-_from_WW_v2_i130.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8e/WonderWoman1970s.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Wonder_woman_02.jpg
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-07-01 15:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-01 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)Welcome to Planet Earth! Enjoy your stay!
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-07-02 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)But I'm still not cool with her casting because yes, she looks the classic thin Hollywood hottie and I don't feel bad about thinking that's uncool. Commenters here are saying how there's nothing wrong with being thin and lean muscle and all that, and that's totally true, but I'm not an idiot. We all know why Hollywood cast a traditional Hollywood hottie with little discernible muscle - because men like that and it sells. Even a movie that should be about a truly badass woman who doesn't give one flying f*ck about the male gaze, still cares a great deal about the male gaze, and that's why I'm not cool with it.