case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-10-04 06:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #5386 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5386 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #771.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
today's post appears to be locked despite the link being posted to LJ

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
DAILY LINKS:

General comments
Off-topic discussion thread


Games threadThread for games/memes/etc.
Edited 2021-10-04 22:15 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't write RPF ships that don't include the RL partners if they have kids because then it feels like I'm trying to uncreate the kids, which is a turnoff.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 21:42 (UTC) - Expand
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2021-10-05 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
Damn....I totally get it, but...do you have *anyone* left to write about?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 06:23 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Did you write them with imaginary kids beforehand or is the whole topic off limits?

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I sorta get that, I probably wouldn't like that very much either - but I never had an rpf pairing in where the kids weren't already at least teenagers lol
chamonix: (Default)

[personal profile] chamonix 2021-10-05 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
That is one cute baby!

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure that, at the time, Odo was seen as a neutral party by all sides, basically because he was considered an outsider by all sides, but it's been a long time so I might be remembering that wrong.

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-10-05 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:29 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, Odo was deliberately neutral and both sides respected that. He wasn't a collaborator (in that he wasn't turning against his own people) but he wasn't one of the ruling class either. Before that he'd been a lab experiment. I think Dukat just had him there because it was less trouble for him than either putting an over-eager Cardassian in place or having to constantly lean on a Bajoran.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] tree_and_leaf - 2021-10-05 08:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix - 2021-10-05 07:00 (UTC) - Expand
4thofeleven: (Default)

[personal profile] 4thofeleven 2021-10-05 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
There's a few episodes that try and add some depth to Odo's role in the Occupation, but I don't think the writers ever really acknowledge that, by any reasonable definition, he was a collaborator at best, at worst an active agent of the Cardassian regime.

(There is the attempt to claim that, unlike his Cardassian predecessors, he enforced the laws justly... but I'm not sure that's possible under a colonial regime, because the laws themselves are unjust.)

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 10:20 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with calling Odo a collaborator is that it implies that he sided against his own people with the enemy. The Bajorans didn’t adopt him. They found him as a child and didn’t even name him. You can’t be a traitor against a side that doesn’t claim you as a citizen. Odo was a third-party contractor working for the wrong side.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 11:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 22:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 11:17 am (UTC)(link)
Oh man, yes! I have a lot of thoughts about this that basically boil down to "keep watching, but also ultimately I agree with you."

The writers' intentions: I think the writers intended Odo to be (on balance) a force of good/protector of Bajorans' interests in a very oppressive system in a way that earned him Bajorans' respect and gratitude, but with some dark aspects to his character which are not public knowledge, which are explored in various episodes. But I also think the writers were a bit naive about what exactly counts as collaboration and how public aspects of Odo's character (such as his "neutrality") would have come off to Bajorans who were fighting for their lives. It is reading a bit against the intention of the text to call Odo a collaborator because the writers didn't intend him to be that -- they wanted him to be a neutral outsider who earned people's respect with his unbreakable sense of justice.

My realistic read of Odo: Is that he always wanted to do the right thing but (1) he was naive and generally a not very thoughtful person and was basically used by Dukat, and (2) he himself has fascist leanings that made the Cardassian regime attractive to him. To me, while he may not have wanted or realized he was playing that role, his overall effect in the Cardassian occupation was to legitimize it and its legal processes. Based on what you see of Odo's past in canon, there is no way he wasn't seen as a collaborator and wasn't an object of resentment for many Bajorans (probably a very polarizing figure), not a neutral outsider who made things more bearable and earned the respect of Cardassians and Bajorans alike.

My attempt to reconcile the two to try to come up with a canon-compliant read of Odo's character that respects the writer's intentions for his character: He must have regularly interfered/exerted his influence on the Cardassian government and/or regularly helped the resistance on the side. This is not actually shown in canon other than his willingness to be blunt with Dukat about the occupation and what he did for Kira when he first met her, but I just have to assume it was a regular thing throughout the years that Odo either assisted the resistance or gave the Cardassian government pushback. My guess is that he personally saved the lives of a lot of Bajorans and so was remembered afterward as a kind of Schindler character, and his history of collaborating with the Cardassians was basically papered over in favor of a more positive reputation. IDK.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 21:22 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you, secret maker for making this secret! I like the color choices made here, and really like how you designed things. It's bon appetite!

Also, I'm grateful to everyone who made a reply to this secret. I feel that I am too smooth-brained to reply to all of them, but I also appreciate seeing everyone's perspective on this matter. I still kinda feel that Odo's position as being liked by both Cardassian and Bajorans alike feels like something that was introduced early before production but wasn't a fully baked idea, and something that future writers felt they had to address somehow. Deep Space Nine is a show that developed a lot as the show went on, and had some interesting character explorations. Perhaps as Kira frequently calls herself a terrorist, perhaps Odo having done his best in trying times is similar shade of gray planned out for him.

(no subject)

[personal profile] killnotic - 2021-10-05 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 15:27 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Same. I was prepared for it to be cringe and something I might've enjoyed in 2012 fandom times but the webtoon is actually enjoyable. Sure, it's still 200% fanservice but it's good fanservice!

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] erinptah - 2021-10-04 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

What is this?

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What is this?

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What is this?

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 11:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What is this?

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What is this?

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 11:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 14:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 17:30 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 21:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
So sweet! I do this too anon, a nice comment (especially a slightly longer/more specific one) really does continue to encourage me during difficult days for months or even years after.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] rudehannibal - 2021-10-05 04:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not familiar with this show, why is it considered bad?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 18:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-10-05 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 20:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-10-05 22:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greghousesgf - 2021-10-04 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] rudehannibal - 2021-10-05 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 11:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix - 2021-10-05 07:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 17:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix - 2021-10-06 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-10-04 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
i keep seeing comments of people saying shit like "i usually don't care about ads but with you i actually trust it!" and it's like, a fantasy author sponsored by nordvpn. like bro they don't know shit about vpns (and nordvpn had in fact a data breach they didn't disclose for a year winkyface ;)))) and even if they did, they're being fucking paid to say this!! that's what ads are!!!

like i don't get it are people really this stupid. do they really see a person go "hey i'm being paid to say this now :)" and think wow they must objectively love the product like... what. bro what

this is not directly related to what you said but you know. a rant in the stewing

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 08:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 14:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-04 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 14:31 (UTC) - Expand

not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

possible TMI re: periods

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 16:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 06:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 06:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 12:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 05:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 07:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 14:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 14:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 17:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 08:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 10:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 05:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: not the point of the secret, but...

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-06 08:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] rivia - 2021-10-05 03:22 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Official clickables thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO huge images or columns of images that require scrolling, please.
2. ONE POST PER USER under in this thread.
3. If you're going to post, try to at least help the others.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) 2021-10-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Like a lot of people I didn't want to let go of summer this year. Between not having the awesome post-pandemic summer we expected and the warm weather lingering on, I refused to acknowledge fall was happening the whole month of September. But this weekend a switch flipped and even though the weather will be rather summery at least the rest of the week, I am ready for fall BRING ON THE PUMPKIN SPICE!!

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-10-05 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 22:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AUTUMN!

[personal profile] pantswarrior - 2021-10-05 13:43 (UTC) - Expand

Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 12:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 13:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Eye update (medical tw also vomit and bees)

(Anonymous) - 2021-10-05 18:28 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-10-04 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Games thread!