case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-02-09 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #6975 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6975 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Hazbin Hotel]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Star Wars Special: C-3PO (2016)]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #996.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
DAILY LINKS:

General comments
Off-topic discussion thread


Games threadThread for games/memes/etc.
Edited 2026-02-10 00:21 (UTC)

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
I LOVE supplemental canon. Lore books, artbooks, world bibles, I eat that shit up like candy, and if I'm really into a particular canon, it's a given that I'm going to own all of the stuff like that that exists for it.

But nothing makes me angrier than when the creators drop some important character information in the supplemental canon rather than putting it in the canon itself. I shouldn't have to consume a separate piece of media to be able to have a full perspective on the characters or the world! Fun trivia is one thing, a fact that completely changes your understanding of a character is something very different.

If it matters, put it in the main canon! :(

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
No argument from me, OP. You're right and you should say it.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
I agree! Important things should be in the mainline canon 100% of the time.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Absolutely this. The extras should be just that, extra. Not Half The Plot or The Stuff That Makes It All Make Sense.
dinogrrl: nebula!A (Default)

[personal profile] dinogrrl 2026-02-10 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
1000% agree.
And heck, not even getting into supplemental material, stop spreading main canon across different media types. No I'm not watching a movie, then an entire tv series, then reading a comic book, just to understand what happens in Movie 2. >:/

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

Such As?

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
I absolutely agree, but I'm so curious as to examples of media that really fucked around putting serious canon in supplemental material. Gimme the tea, people.

Re: Such As?

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Such As?

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:01 (UTC) - Expand
neoyi: (Default)

[personal profile] neoyi 2026-02-10 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, 100%. Love supplementary materials, but they should be optional stuff to add to the worldbuilding and lore. All the important stuff relevant to the main thing should be in the main thing!

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
I do agree, but it's not always the fault of creators. If the studio or network has final cut, sometime things that were intended to be canon get cut and if the only way the creators can get it out is in a supplemental material, I don't fault the creators for it. I have heard many stories of scenes with some pretty important character information being deleted at studio/network insistence.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed. Even if the story is interesting, that's just inconsiderate.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
Like how apparently Kylo Ren didn't slaughter all his classmates, the Knights of Ren did. I feel that was pretty pertinent information, but because I didn't read the comic book, I never knew until someone told me.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
YEAH. I'm a big supplement enjoyer, but like... if it's not in the Main Thing, it's OPTIONAL. You are, in fact, the bad guy, if you tell another fan that they have to incorporate something that does not exist in a movie into their fanfic or their headcanons because the creator said something somewhere about someone's backstory.

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
I witnessed some kerfluffle recently where an artist announced an added bonus for a patreon smut BL fancomic. The issue was that the top/bottom dynamic (for this single bonus, mind, not the entire comic) was the opposite of what the comic was originally tagged as (so B/A instead of the tagged A/B). And several people completely LOST THEIR SHIT about it. And while I can understand that if it's on Patreon and you pay for it, it's not an ideal situation but damn, it's a BONUS chapter. You'll live.

And some comments went all "it's not just about who tops but the character dynamic/characterisation is suuuper different for A/B than B/A" and seriously? If the characterisation changes so drastically based on who takes it up the ass, that sounds like you REALLY need to examine some weird underlying prejudices you might be having.

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. The characterization can be different.

This isn't real life, where it would be absolutely absurd to say that I can tell someone's bedroom habits just by meeting them. Fiction, if it's any good, has to abide by certain rules of narrative structure, continuous thematic elements, and characterization that we get to delve in deeper than any actual person we will ever meet. All of those things means that we do get insight into what their character is/will be like in the bedroom and if it doesn't flow with the narrative and the thematic elements, it's bad characterization.

(no subject)

[personal profile] feotakahari - 2026-02-10 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:15 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 06:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 07:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 07:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 08:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 06:59 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Obsessiveness amnd enthusiasm do not equal Fandom.

But I'm happy you enjoy your fancy cup.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 07:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:44 (UTC) - Expand

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
The closest I've ever come to cosplaying is pretending to be Carrie Bradshaw every time I visit New York City

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 09:13 (UTC) - Expand

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
I fear that I'm beginning to find Vox/Vincent Whitman hot And I don't know how I feel about that

B!S: I blame the MurderMedia (human Vox/human Alastor) art

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
06. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/0543afeaabb4.png
[Star Wars Special: C-3PO (2016)]

Transcript by OP

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
I know no one really cares about the droids, even less C-3PO. But I really like the comic that explains his red arm, And I wish we got to see more of that C-3PO.
He's normally only there for comedy, so it's understandable, but there was a genuine opportunity to have him have sort of a character growth, where without R2, he has to wise up and be more proactive.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:45 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

What makes something count as a "fandom" to you?

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Is it enough for something to have fans?
Have fans that talk to each other about the thing?
Have communities dedicated to that thing?
Fans that create works based on the thing?
Etc

Re: What makes something count as a "fandom" to you?

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What makes something count as a "fandom" to you?

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: What makes something count as a "fandom" to you?

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2026-02-10 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2026-02-10 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] dani_phantasma - 2026-02-10 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2026-02-10 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] dani_phantasma - 2026-02-10 04:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2026-02-10 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Denver, Colorado

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 09:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Questions!

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

Brandon and Tyler

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Brandon and Tyler

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Brandon and Tyler

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

Fuck Discord

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fuck Discord

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fuck Discord

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Fuck Discord

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:44 (UTC) - Expand

SA with new info

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SA with new info

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SA with new info

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 04:06 (UTC) - Expand

Figure skating gripe

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 02:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Figure skating gripe

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Figure skating gripe

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Figure skating gripe

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2026-02-10 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Games thread!

(Anonymous) 2026-02-10 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
#Worldle #1481 (10.02.2026) 2/6 (100%)
🔥 Current Win Streak: 4 days
🟩🟩🟨⬜⬜➡️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉

https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/share

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2026-02-10 05:58 (UTC) - Expand