Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2010-03-23 04:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #1174 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1174 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
101.

__________________________________________________
102.

__________________________________________________
103.

__________________________________________________
104.

__________________________________________________
105.

__________________________________________________
106.

__________________________________________________
107.

__________________________________________________
108.

__________________________________________________
109.

__________________________________________________
110.

__________________________________________________
111.

__________________________________________________
112.

__________________________________________________
113.

__________________________________________________
114.

__________________________________________________
115.

__________________________________________________
116.

__________________________________________________
117.

__________________________________________________
118.

__________________________________________________
119.

__________________________________________________
120.

__________________________________________________
121.

__________________________________________________
122.

__________________________________________________
123.

__________________________________________________
124.

__________________________________________________
125.

__________________________________________________
126.

__________________________________________________
127.

__________________________________________________
128.

__________________________________________________
129.

__________________________________________________
130.

__________________________________________________
131.

__________________________________________________
132.

__________________________________________________
133.

__________________________________________________
134.

__________________________________________________
135.

__________________________________________________
136.

__________________________________________________
137.

__________________________________________________
138.

__________________________________________________
139.

__________________________________________________
140.

__________________________________________________
141.

__________________________________________________
142.

__________________________________________________
143.

__________________________________________________
144.

__________________________________________________
145.

__________________________________________________
146.

__________________________________________________
147.

__________________________________________________
148.

__________________________________________________
149.

__________________________________________________
150.

__________________________________________________
151.

__________________________________________________
152.

__________________________________________________
153.

__________________________________________________
154.

__________________________________________________
155.

__________________________________________________
156.

__________________________________________________
157.

Notes:
April 1st Submissions Post is open!
Secrets Left to Post: 08 pages, 185 secrets from Secret Submission Post #168.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 141
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)there's a sock-puppet mod because the mods arent mature enough to be impartial and take personal responsibility. when members hate them, their feeewings are hurted.
these same mods feature quizzes that only 'people of color' should take because only they matter, nobody of a different color could possibly relate to 'their' black princess.
there is zero allowance for criticizing uhura as a character, zoe as an actress, or black females in sci-fi in general because they are all put on a pedastol and if you do, you're a fucking racist.
you don't like the pda on the transporter pad in front of every fucking body? your a RACIST! you cant stand to see a STRONG BAMF BLACK INTELLIGENT WELL SPOKEN BEAUTIFUL FINE REAL DEAL SISTA ruin your lilly white hero.
you like her pony tail? RACIST! you can stand to see a NAPPY KINKY FUZZY HEADED STRONG BAMF BLACK WOMAN DO HER THANG WITHOUT TRYING TO WHITEN HER UP!just because she's not white, it's not alright!OUTRAGGEE! BLACK POWA'...
the S/U com has all the craziness of the "iTz t0taLLy CaNoN" K/S com but none of the solidarity.
Re: 141
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)Wat.
lmfao remember that random OT post about Doctor Who a while back? No one in that comm is bitter u guyz.
lol u mad
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: 141
same anon
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)plus they have a mod who would call someone a racist at the drop of a hat and exaggerate everything to horrific proportions. one person, ONE PERSON, who said they wanted someone to take uhura down a "peg or two" in a kinkmeme was slapped with the label racist. no one ever asked the op what they meant, never asked if they where aware that it could be misconstrued as racist and misogynistic, they where just labeled and back up from the comm was called to war in the thread. thats when s/u fans got a horrible reputation on lj and it never fucking ended because any body who spoke out against s/u, or uhura or zoe HAS TO HAVE ~latent racist tendencies~ because this person and people defending the op told them they were digging too deep. another time, one person on f!s posted a secret about sucky stories in the s/u fandom (not even identifying the community specifically) and then OHSHITSON! EVRY1 IS AGAINST US B/C WE'RE BLACK.BURNITDOWN!1!1
so it wasn't racial awareness i have issue with, its using race to, like you said, bully everyone into following what they believe is the proper way to like/enjoy uhura. you MUST recognize she is black and black women are like this....while white girls are like this...you MUST understand this to *get* her character. YOU MUST. which is why there are shit load of OT posts like UHURA NEEDED BLACK HAIR TO REALLY BE BLACK, UHURA AND THE BLACK BRUTE TROPES, S/U AND MARTHA/TEN ~WHITE PPLZ HATE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE BLACK~. NEWSFLASH!!1 a lot of ppl didn't like rose/nine, objected crazily to it, but that's ok and expected because anything that happens in fandom is subject to scrutiny. but since martha's black there can be no objections because....SHE'S BLACK!!?????? yes there are racists, but its hard to pick them out from people who seriously don't like the pairing because of whatever reason so play it safe AND DON'T INCLUDE EVERYBODY WHO OBJECTS TO THE PAIRING AS A RACIST BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU SOUND LIKE A FUCKWIT AND MAKES THE REST OF US LOOK BAD.
Re: same anon
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)I don't ship S/U, but I've seen the wonder (cough) that is the S/U comm and I feel your pain. I would never, ever want my OTP's comms to look like that (to put it mildly.)
another time, one person on f!s posted a secret about sucky stories in the s/u fandom (not even identifying the community specifically) and then OHSHITSON! EVRY1 IS AGAINST US B/C WE'RE BLACK.BURNITDOWN!1!1
This is relevant to my interests. What story was this?
Re: same anon
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: same anon again
(Anonymous) 2010-03-23 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 00:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
Re: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 01:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 03:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:51 (UTC) - Expand*the pictures
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
Re: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon again
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: same anon
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 03:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: 141
We spell better than that! :P
Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
People do get excited sometimes but nothing like what you're making it out to be.
Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
The fact that there seems to be only one person here saying positive things reveals a lot more than anonymous commentating ever could.
LOL! Yes, because I am only one person my comment is completely invalid! Logic win!
Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
Surely you can see the logic in that.
Re: 141 - Goddamn, where have I been?
YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:24 am (UTC)(link)if you see nothing wrong with the comm its because you srsly choose not to or you agree. not judging, but you are part of the problem i have with the comm.
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
People need to be able to talk. Now if there have been people being shut down without a chance to express their issues, then yeah, I missed that.
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 00:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 03:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 03:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:17 (UTC) - ExpandTHIS. I JUST SAID THE SAME THING.
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 03:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Re: YES. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:32 (UTC) - ExpandTalk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 05:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 06:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 06:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 06:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 04:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 05:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Talk about a non-sequitur...
Re: Talk about a non-sequitur...
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 06:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 12:32 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 02:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Just my two cents.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 19:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 19:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 19:35 (UTC) - ExpandThis
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 20:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-29 00:42 (UTC) - ExpandSad but true
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 04:40 am (UTC)(link)Honestly, it feels like if you're white or hell, just NOT black, you don't get to say anything.
It kind of pains me to see a comm for a pairing I really like totally self-destructing and driving away all the fans. Granted the ST fandom as a whole is kind of crazy but at least the shippers are crazy TOWARD other shippers, not within their own group.
there's a lot of hypocrisy over there
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 09:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)ignoring the fact that hey! There are other ethnicities which are just accepted by the fandom, without having to be shoved down your throat and Spock = "white man", Spock = "white Vulcan, BUT IF ANYONE TAKES HER MAN THAT'S RACIST BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO LOVE THE BLACK WOMAN FOR BEING BLACK AND FOR NOTHING ELSE BECAUSE SHE IS BLACK.(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 13:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 18:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 20:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 22:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2010-03-24 23:03 (UTC) - ExpandYES OMG YES
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: YES OMG YES
(Anonymous) 2010-03-24 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)