Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-01 03:19 pm
[ SECRET POST #2007 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2007 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 111 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ], [ 1 - empty image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)Or a straight person saying they're not "straight" because they don't like homophobes? Or a gay person saying they're not "gay" because they aren't stereotypical?
Words have meanings.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And the "not calling yourself gay" rather makes my point for me. When trying to reach as many people as possible (say, to give health information to any who might need it) people tend to use the term "men who have sex with men." Precisely because some people have what you or I might call "gay sex", but for whatever reason don't identify with the label.
So thanks for making my point for me, anon. Totally agree that words have meanings -- and totally tired of people making "feminist" mean everything!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)No. "Believing in God" is not what defines a "Christian" so you're getting the definitions wrong to begin with. You didn't even specify a Christian God or Christian ideals. "God" can apply to so many religions.
MSM always struck me as homophobic. Attracted to men but they don't want to be associated with ~the gays~ so they'll just be men who happen to have sex with men all the time! Your examples are pretty shitty ones and don't really proev your point.
no subject
When I say that I don't label myself a feminist, I mean that I am not a part of that movement (was, actually, for years, and then left it.) I do consider myself part of other movements, such as the disability rights movement. And yes, I believe those movements overlap in some ways, and don't have a problem with that. But when I assert that I'm part of one and not part of the other, I'm making a point about where I choose to put my energy (and why I do -- there are a lot of feminists who have the very rigid and deeply upsetting attitude people here mock as "SJW." I don't think all feminists are like this, but it was widespread in the circles I was in and I haven't seen evidence that the problem has lessened much at all. Intolerance and rigid ideology that resulted in some very bizarre exclusions seems to have dogged feminist community since at least the '70s.
So when someone says "You are a feminist! I insist!" I wonder why they want to force me into "sisterhood" with them, and why they of all people miss the meaning of the word "No."
no subject
No, you've got it backwards. You don't have to be part of a "movement" to be a feminist.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 22:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 20:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)But then I'm not sure how you'd qualify being part of the movement. I mean, I live my life by my own values and those values do include feminism.
If you don't want to be a feminist, that's fine. I tend to think people who aren't feminists or humanists are just refusing because of backlash from popular depictions of extremists, or that they dont' really understand what feminism is about.
no subject
But simply to say "I live my life according to these values" and never to have marched, or stood in front of the County board, or met with state legislators, or headed to the Hill -- well, at one time I might have said someone can do nothing but have the values and I'd call them a member of the movement. But after spending years devoting so much time and effort to the movement of my choice, I'm a bit disillusioned with people whose hearts are in the right place but who don't do the work.
Of course there are a lot of ways to do the work and not all of them are direct action. I'd call the people who run several blogs that actually have large followings part of the movement. It's not about specific things.
But I'm disillusioned with people who occasionally blog about things now and then, or who read major blogs and nod in agreement, or who participate in heated comment threads and little else. I don't question the person's values, but I do question whether the person is someone who really works for change or just a good person with a good heart.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 21:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
DA
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 23:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)I'm female and I believe in equal rights, but I don't call myself a feminist. I'm thinking equalist might be a good term except it was coined by villains first.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)They never said anything about activists. They just said that disliking homophobes doesn't make that person any less "straight" by definition.
I believe in equal rights
Other people will call you feminist because that is what feminist means. Your gender doesn't matter.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
But that's always struck me as pretty bizarre. Basically it means anyone sitting around going "Boy, a more equitable world would be awesome!" is a member of a whole slew of movements.
I'd much rather people reserve the term for those people who actually do shit. But this would probably offend people who think making a couple comments on a messageboard/community makes them a change maker.
Personally I think it's a very rare and special person who can really devote herself to more than one movement and do the work. Because heaven knows we have a long, long way to go.
no subject
What's wrong with this world is that it's turned "feminist" into such a bad word that even people who are feminist (like you) don't want to say they are.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 21:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 02:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 22:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)It's not that I don't share the goal of equality for everyone but to be honest many outspoken Feminist I read about in papers/watched on talkshows etc. and the ones on the Internet are kinda scary people who end up so focused on women issues that they forget that other people (even men) have problems generated by society as well.
I'm not against feminism but I don't want to be associated with it because it's new advocates seem to be a bunch of crazy people (at least where I live).
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 22:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 02:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 06:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 01:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 22:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)If anything, you sound antifeminist.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)On the other... you seem a little too invested in not caring about the rights of women in particular.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)Except, when it comes to men vs. women, men are not really in danger of having fewer rights. Excluding trans men, who face their own set of persecutions, men have more rights than women everywhere in the world. So if you're concerned with being a "humanist," or whatever dumb shit people are calling it these days, then you're concerned with feminism. Sorry, but in general society, "oppressed men" is not a thing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-01 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)...unless the men in question are non-straight, non-white, disabled, poor, and so forth. You remembered the transmen, but all of the rest are not female exclusive areas and that anon was not only talking about gender.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 22:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-01 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 02:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 21:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 12:58 am (UTC)(link)That's why it's called feminism.
Because men don't need to have their rights fought for, they already have them.
hth
(no subject)