Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-29 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #2097 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2097 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 129 secrets from Secret Submission Post #300.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)I don't use X because I've never seen it really done, but I'm starting to think people who do are better at fandom and the internet than I am. :/
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 02:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-04 06:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)I don't know how many people see it that way, too, but when I ship a couple who I see as equals or interchanging (which is most of my pairings, really) I'd rather not use '/'.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 22:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 22:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 22:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-01 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 20:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 21:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 01:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I prefer "x" because I think it's more visually clean and aesthetically appealing. I always put a space in between the names and the "x" though, otherwise it looks messy and confusing. So, for example (to take one of my OTPs off the top of my head):
Bleh: JohnxVriska
Better: John/Vriska
Best: John x Vriska
The whole "top/bottom" thing makes sense, but I'd never heard of it before reading these comments. I tend to ship pairings as couples and not just for the porn, so it feels a little weird to use it that way for me, but whatever works, I guess. If I'm listing pairings I tend to alphabetize the names so as not to be giving an indication as to who I think is "better" or "in charge" but perhaps one of the reasons I do this is that the majority of my ships are het.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)I assumed this still applied. Obviously not.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 21:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-29 22:06 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 23:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-01 00:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Now this is definately subjective reasoning on my part. Obviously ship naming conventions vary by fandom, and nowhere have I found a definate guide on how to write out a ship name. I guess I should mention that I'm in my mid-twenties, and that I've been in a variety of fandoms, from anime to American comics, and for the most part haven't changed my ship naming preference.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 06:12 (UTC) - ExpandCONSENSUS FOR THIS THREAD
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CONSENSUS FOR THIS THREAD
Re: CONSENSUS FOR THIS THREAD
no subject
no subject
no subject
Apart from that... I'm glad you recognise that your prejudice is stupid?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-29 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)Of course, since I'm old, my memory might be lagging.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 02:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 04:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 04:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 13:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-09-30 18:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)