Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-13 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #2111 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2111 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 124 secrets from Secret Submission Post #301.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-13 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)But hey, to each their own, I personally prefer a person's inner beauty to their being a mysogonistic, Republican, walking, talking asshole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-13 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 07:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 01:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Hold your ground.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:31 am (UTC)(link)So yeah, thinking women should have less agency over their bodies than dead people is anti-woman.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:47 am (UTC)(link)continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 07:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 19:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 19:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 06:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 00:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 06:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 09:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:01 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 08:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 09:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 15:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 16:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 00:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 06:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 18:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 20:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 07:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 03:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 05:26 am (UTC)(link)By all means, say you yourself won't have an abortion. It's your right. But ignoring the ramifications of outlawing abortion is just frighteningly ignorant.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 01:40 am (UTC)(link)He's also for getting rid of planned parenthood. Being 'anti-abortion' hits more than just abortion, it also hits other contraceptives women use. Some of which do more for them than just 'stopping pregnancy', or god forbid, sex before marriage!
I'd say he's pretty damn misogynistic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 01:58 am (UTC)(link)And does being anti-abortion equate to anti-contraceptive, really? I'm not too familiar with American laws but they seem like two entirely separate issues. While the majority who are against abortion may very well be against contraceptive use, legally it should be an entirely different issue. I mean, sheesh, if you want to put all these anti-abortion laws into effect you would think that there would be MORE promotion of contraceptives.
I just have a problem whenever I hear someone personally attacking anyone, whether they be a politician, actor, writer, etc. You can find some of Ryan's policies disgusting, but you don't know the man personally. While they project a public image, they are also people with families, friends, parents. Ryan has very young children, and it would bother me if the kids heard on the news or just walking down the street about a bunch of people talking about how their father is a "misogynistic scumbag." It's the same thing with Sarah Palin; you don't know how many times I've heard the whole family called a bunch of rednecks, or backwards. And poor Bristol gets slutshamed and called "trash" for daring to get pregnant. I just really feel for these families.
no subject
In your research, you might also learn that many Republicans are also anti-contraceptive these days because it gets them points with conservative Christians.
I don't understand what on earth is supposed to separate a man's policies from his person, incidentally. He's voted against fair pay for women. He's voted against basic healthcare for women. He literally does not want women to be equal. Yes, that absolutely makes him a misogynist.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:36 am (UTC)(link)One of these things is not like the other. Shaming or insulting someone for how they live their own lives is awful. Shaming or insulting someone for advocating and advancing policies that seek to strip others of their rights is A-OK. They should be ashamed of attacking the rights of others. If he doesn't want his kids to hear him being called a misogynistic scumbag, then it's his responsibility not to BE one.
And yeah, conservatives in the US have decided that most forms of contraception actually are abortion somehow, so that's how they link the two issues. That, and they're both excuses for them to promote their version of "sexual morality."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 03:05 am (UTC)(link)What an odd way for conservatives to think! It appears so counterproductive to me. And it's very odd since in American media everyone seems to be so sexualized, yet they have this concern for "sexual morality."
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 20:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 00:49 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:46 am (UTC)(link)http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/08/19/712251/how-todd-akin-and-paul-ryan-partnered-to-redefine-rape/?mobile=nc
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:50 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Do your research before you post something like this. Paul Ryan is notoriously anti-women in his record.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:14 am (UTC)(link)Like he said in the debate, regardless of circumstances a life is being taken away, so that's why he thinks the circumstances don't matter. Even in a situation like rape, the baby is not the one at fault. But because this is such an emotional, complicated issue he is willing to temper his position for the sake of the American people, even if he personally disagrees. I don't think the fact that he's personally anti-abortion in any instance (except for the life of the mother? maybe? idk) is proof of HATRED for women; it's proof that he values the life of unborn men and women. And I don't see how The Personhood Ammendment is proof of hatred either. I think it's a bit silly for them to count as "people" once fertilized (if anything, wait until it has a heartbeat!), but again, not hatred.
What are his reasons for defunding planned parenthood?
The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act thing was news to me. I don't know how anyone in their right mind would vote against it.
no subject
His reasons for defunding Planned Parenthood are that Republicans have ignorantly and incorrectly painted the organization as an abortion provider, even though that's an incredibly small fraction of the health services they actually provide to women, in particular low-income women.
He also, by the way, is part of a group that has been stalling the passage of the Violence Against Women Act. Thanks, Republican Congressmen!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:41 am (UTC)(link)It might be that the internet can't convey tone well, or it might be because English is not my first language, but I am not trying to "combat" anyone. I made it very clear to say "I" never got that impression. Not that he's not, necessarily, but it would come as a surprise for me from what I have seen of him. And I don't know why the heck you think I hate liberals or think they are morons, I just know that many here are up-to-date on these issues and hate Ryan. I am not "belligerent" or trying to fight anyone. You may believe me or not; it is none of my concern. And I do admit I am ignorant in some regards to American politics because I have other things much closer at home to worry about. I know the basics but I do not know about things that are generally not spoken about a lot or not on the television. If you believe I am combative because of the "ridiculous" part of my comment, I should hope that most people are sensible enough to assume that not wanting abortions does not mean he or she "hates all women." It's a lot more of a complicated issue than that. No one should take offense to that because I believe most people are intelligent enough to see the gray here, even if they don't agree with it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:53 (UTC) - Expandcontinued, accidentally hit "enter" key
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 02:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued, accidentally hit "enter" key
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued, accidentally hit "enter" key
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: continued, accidentally hit "enter" key
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 03:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 02:41 am (UTC)(link)That's the problem. He can "value" the lives of fetuses all he wants, until he starts trying to force women to gestate them against their will. That's when it becomes hatred for women.
What are his reasons for defunding planned parenthood?
Because PP provides abortion services (though they are forbidden from using government money for abortions), which in his mind makes them completely evil and so they shouldn't get any funding to help low-income women get contraception or pap spears or mammograms or prenatal care
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 04:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 05:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 07:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 16:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 19:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:06 (UTC) - Expand