Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-14 03:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #2112 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2112 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 102 secrets from Secret Submission Post #302.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-17 11:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
They can't find it. Cause Uhara has it and she's not pulling it out of her snatch. She literally spends the entire movie leg locked around Spock's waist. He'd say this shit was illogical but he knows turning down never-ending poon is even more illogical. So he raises an eyebrow and says nothing.
Sulu says "Oh my." constantly at the sight of this. Sometimes Old Spock comes over and grabs the other end. Because Jim is too young and he's not a pedophile.
I have these feels just to even you out. Welcome to the cosmic balance.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)And so would Kirk.
no subject
no subject
My night is complete.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
No K/McCoy though, are you crazy? XD
no subject
I actually...don't understand this at all. If there's absolutely no hope for your OTP to become canon, why would you ever want to destroy the pleasure of people who ship a conflicting canon couples by breaking them up and ruining the ship for a whole lot of other fans -- just so you don't have to go through the process of writing a breakup scene or slightly AU-ifying your doomed OTP's fic? I understand it if you think the couple actually has a prayer of being canon, but if it doesn't...why? Why on earth would you want to do that?
I agree that it's really irritating that m/m couples never become canon, but I've seen this attitude with people who ship obscure het couples who will never become canon, and it completely, utterly baffles me. Unless you would've disliked the pairing in question even completely separate from the fact that it conflicts with your OTP (because you think the characters are terrible together/it's problematic/etc), but wanting to break up a perfectly fine canon couple that lots of people ship even though the endgame for that scenario is "both characters are alone and less happy than they used to be, all their fans are pissed, and your OTP is still not canon and not going to be canon"? I just...I don't understand why anyone would wish for that.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 11:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-15 08:11 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 11:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
COME AT ME BRO!!!!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 22:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 22:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 11:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 12:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 11:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 11:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-14 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:25 (UTC) - ExpandMaybe they just like dude on dude?
Re: Maybe they just like dude on dude?
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe they just like dude on dude?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-17 12:11 (UTC) - Expandyeah
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 00:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 02:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-16 14:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 14:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 03:12 (UTC) - ExpandA new ship is hopefully born.
Re: A new ship is hopefully born.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 05:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 20:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 01:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 13:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)But..... I am so very, very done being emotionally invested in the Reboot verse. I'll see the next movie (and any subsequent ones) in theatres a few times and buy the DVD(s), but only because I'm playing the game of "do what you can to signal to Paramount that there is still a market for another Trek TV series".
The saddest part about it all is that the Spock/Uhura ship, as horribly OOC and anti-feminist as it is, isn't even in the top five reasons I dislike the Reboot verse.
GIVE ME YOUR REASONS!
Re: GIVE ME YOUR REASONS!
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 03:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GIVE ME YOUR REASONS!
Re: GIVE ME YOUR REASONS!
Re: GIVE ME YOUR REASONS!
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 19:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 14:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-16 14:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-14 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-15 14:18 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Does Spock/Uhura not count as legitimate because you don't like them together? They kissed onscreen and everything, that's pretty damn legitimate.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-15 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)If you expect them to break up in the sequel you're in for some disappointment because from what I've read by writers and a thing Zoe Saldana said, it's evident that they'll continue the romance and it wouldn't make sense otherwise. Had them not wanted it to continue they wouldn't have put it in the first movie, and they chose Spock among all the characters. Vulcans are freaking serious about their relationships.
(I love the Kirk/McCoy and Kirk/Spock scenes too!)
Thanks but no thanks
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-16 02:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thanks but no thanks
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-16 10:59 (UTC) - Expand