Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-03-17 04:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #1535 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1535 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

__________________________________________________
41.

__________________________________________________
42.

__________________________________________________
43.

__________________________________________________
44.

__________________________________________________
45.

__________________________________________________
46.

__________________________________________________
47.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #219.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
+1
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And the wank over Moriarty being a man strikes me as so fundamentally STUPID. I... I guess I assumed that most 'Sherlock' fans got into it because they were fans of the ACD canon... *eye roll* I mean, yes, there are updates and changes, but the idea of so many people flipping out over that... ugh.
So yeah, anyway, you're not alone.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)I loved Moriarty, I thought he (character+actor) was amazing. But I haven't been a part of Sherlock fandom since, like, the first... fortnight. Craziest fandom I've ever known.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:47 (UTC) - Expand+1
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)Looks like a cool show otherwise, though.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 21:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 03:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I don't even think I want to argue to people who disagree or don't see it; not because I think their opinions are invalid but because I don't think we'd ever see eye-to-eye about that particular issue.
Just... gah.
QuicksinistercutstoAsiansinSohoChinatown WHAT WERE YOU DOING SHOW!?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Comments with my one Moriarty icon
The second episode does bother me, but for so many reasons. It's just weak and contrived compared to Gatiss and Moffat's episodes. Sherlock figured out that the tenant would be connected to the case because they didn't pick up their phone book from the front step? What? And everybody just happened to live and work in buildings with conveniently-placed terraces.
no subject
1) I find it funny that you need to clarify that you are a female fan
2) You can have a show with male protagonists and still give the female characters a strong personality that doesn't revolve around men.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)You guys are really stupid. I mean this secret is moronic. This secret could be on Fox News. It's basically narrowing everything down to inaccurate bulletpoints. None of the points you're making are what people have actually said, they're things on the fringes.
There aren't "strong female characters" (which I am SO GLAD people are reappropriating that phrase to be a bad thing, thanks guys, really) in a sense that the female characters are actually TERRIBLE. Not just "weak" but TERRIBLE. The police officer is the "bitchy bully" to poor Sherlock, Molly is easily manipulated constantly and shamed for flirting, the older woman has her house abused and is treated like a maidservant instead of a landlord. And let's not forget John's girlfriend who couldn't TIP OVER HER CHAIR to save her life.
I could give two fucks if it's a male driven show and you enjoy it, but ignoring and writing off all the problems this show has, because don't want your enjoyment ruined by guilt, well that's shallow and lazy. You can enjoy problematic things, but stop defending them like they're perfect and throwing in a little shame for people who take a critical eye to things!
And you really think all the horrible Orientalism in the second episode was only to do with the fact that the characters were Chinese? REALLY?
I can't even with this secret.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:36 (UTC) - Expandmaking tea makes bad feminists
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: making tea makes bad feminists
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And the second episode was loaded with extremely fun and exciting moments, and the puzzle was interesting and they solved it in a believable way. The interaction between John and Sherlock was amazing. So yeah, maybe the writers could have made the bad guys French instead of Chinese, and not occurred the wrath, but I don't have a problem with it being Chinese. It's still a good story.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)1) Yes, the show is called Sherlock. It's centered around Sherlock because that's the point of the show. But that is no excuse for not having properly developed female characters that have a larger stake in the plot. All the plot driving characters are male and that's a problem regardless of what people think and until it's addressed it will BE a problem.
(And while we're on female characters: Molly. I have more of an issue with how fandom sees her than how she's written. She IS actually stronger than people give her credit.)
2) The second episode is racist, full stop. I challenge ANYONE to defend the scenes set in ~china town~ that are clearly meant to look ~mysterious and dangerous~ because you can't without willful ignorance, you just can't.
3) I like this Moriarty. No complaints there.
I just think that sometimes Sherlock fandom is filled with people who are too afraid to actually take a clear look at the show and realise it's NOT perfect and it DOES have flaws and some pretty serious ones. The second you bring it up your told to stfu because NOONE cares about *anything* other than Sherlock and John. And I hate that.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 22:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-17 23:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
In short, I guess I am saying I want more than three episodes per series, dagnabbit. (Mind you, I guess we are lucky that we getting any additional series since "Sherlock" is a co-production between BBC and PBS. And with the Republicans going after PBS funding, I don't know how long we are going to be able to get more episodes.)
(no subject)
no subject
2. Eh... I really think there was some racefail, yes. It has less to do with "the bad guys wee Chinese!" and more with the way ALL the Chinese characters, good or bad, were portrayed.
3. Honestly, I don't care much for the Bledchel test, anyway.
4. I don't care that Moriarty is a White guy. I think he's annoying, over the top panto villain better suited to bad a Saturday morning cartoon, but his race and gender don't bother me. As you say, it actually might have been worse if they'd made him a minority.
You're doing it wrong.
(Anonymous) 2011-03-17 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)Also - the Bechdel Test? <a href="http://thehathorlegacy.com/the-bechdel-test-its-not-about-passing/>You missed the point</a>.
no subject
OT
Re: OT
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 04:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OT
Re: OT
Re: OT
Re: OT
Re: OT
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
+1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 03:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 05:21 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 06:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 07:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-03-18 14:55 (UTC) - Expand