Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-24 06:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #2122 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2122 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #303.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: wow
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)most sterek fans end up being scott haters, or at least they enjoy putting him down/making fun of him/acting like he is terrible and stupid. a favorite term is to call him a potato which is ableist and gross. not to mention dragging him down for his grades and generally calling him dumbass, dumb fuck, etc.
COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)they also make fun of his personality. he is a very happy kid (most of the time), very nice. he is also prone to playing captain obvious and saying stuff that fans also call him stupid for. they see him as an airhead and totally worthless and lost without Stiles (his bff, and half of Sterek). and even in canon on the show when he pulls the rug out of under the season's big bad....people refused to believe he came up with the plan on his own. because he is 'too stupid'. the term potato is supposedly used as a term of endearment, like "aww he is so stupid look at how cute he is" but it's not endearing. at all. it's also been used to make fun of people with downs so using it to describe someone....ugh.
(fandom also likes to compare him to a dog, and draw him and only him as a dog, which a+ comparing a POC character to an animal and inanimate objects)
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)I love Scott and hate all the negativity toward him, too - especially calling him "potato". :/
When was it mentioned that he was a good student before getting bitten, though? I thought he was always on the average/below average scale, and it tipped after the bite, but I never saw his grades as a reason to hate him, regardless, since he's such a sweetheart. In fact, he's one half of MY OTP, but I just don't recall it being mentioned in canon that he had good grades before?
If you could fill me in, that would be awesome. Since he's one of my favorites, I tend to write him a lot, and more insight into his character from details I missed would help. Thanks! :)
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)also, and this is something that you could argue for or against, he is in the same math class as lydia. i imagine that lydia would be in a math class that is the higher level choice (for example, in my HS it was normal to take algebra I in freshman year, but if you wanted to you could take one level math higher). if he is on par with lydia clearly he is not 'below average'. but again that is more fanon than canon.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
I mean, look at all the entries under Ron the Death Eater at tvtropes. Obviously it's different when the insults and whatnot aimed at a character are actual slurs and offensive language, but the general underlying intention seems to be the same. People don't like someone, but they don't have a solid rational reason to dislike them, so they exaggerate any slightly negative trait (bad grades, short temper, clumsiness, etc...) to such outrageous proportions that the person becomes a caricature to them. If enough people do the same, fanon interpretation of that character eventually becomes unrecognizable when compared to canon.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
But hearing that the actual main character is a happy nice kid dealing with being a werewolf has actually piqued my interest! Happy characters dealing with shitty things is my bulletproof character trope, I WILL ALWAYS LOVE IT.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 12:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
And Scott is pretty much always adorable throughout. And badass at times.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Granted, it's been on the reading list here on DW just as much as Tumblr. (Ahahahaha FILTER BY TAGS, I LOVE YOU)
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-26 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)Scott just doesn't happen to be people's favorite character and some parts of the fandom find this upsetting. The potato thing is really really stupid in fandom - but I haven't seen one of the big shippers mean it maliciously or in an ableist fashion. The first commenter is just stirring shit up.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-26 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)He would be if that was all he was. But then he was turned into a werewolf, so...
Seriously, all the characters are cliched tropes, and intentionally so, because it's on MTV. The creators know who butters their bread, honey, and they pander to cliches every day.
but I haven't seen one of the big shippers mean it maliciously or in an ableist fashion. The first commenter is just stirring shit up.
NTAYRT but what does it matter who says it, whether it's a 'big shipper'? Is that supposed to make it less offensive that only 1000 non-BNF's are using it daily? I guess that's acceptable then?
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
And I'll say it a million times. The guy is an airhead. It's a running joke how he isn't swift. Like the "Alison" password bit. "You still want him in your pack?" And when the writers are serious, they go with the threat of him having to repeat a grade because he was failing so many classes.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Plus, he fucked up Gerard in the season finale. He's not stupid - he's just a little bit of an airhead.
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 23:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 03:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:21 (UTC) - Expand