Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-10-23 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #1755 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 206 secrets from Secret Submission Post #251.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 2 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
To me that just seems like you don't care a bit about the characters as you clearly have no interest in their canon identities, and yes, if they are presented as straight in the show you cannot just assume OH THEY'RE BI TOO. No.
Of course I take the same issue with f/f if the characters are straight. You can't just change their sexualities so you have something to fap to. Go find a show where the chars ARE homosexual/bi so you're not writing OOC nonsense.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)if they are presented as straight in the show you cannot just assume OH THEY'RE BI TOO. No.
Actually, yes we can. Fandom's awesome like that :D
Go find a show where the chars ARE homosexual/bi so you're not writing OOC nonsense.
We totally would if there were more. Plus, spiting people like you while we write what we want is just an extra bonus.
no subject
Just enjoy your OOC fics and the fact you think sexuality is easily changed for your means - do you think it's a choice irl too or is it only so easy to swap for fictional characters.. D:
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 03:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 07:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 12:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Because that is the nature of shipping. Always has been. Always will be.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
2. Very few characters who are 'presented as straight' actually have their sexuality explored in any detail. Unless they are queer, characters do not tend to have their sexuality directly stated in canon, because straight is assumed to be the default, so all characters are straight until proven otherwise.
3. Sexuality is fluid. Even if a character is only shown dating people of the opposite sex in canon, that doesn't mean they will never ever ever fall for someone of the same sex.
4. Shipping someone with a person of the same sex is not automatically OOC. I'm a gay women, I am occasionally attracted to men, and my personality does not become wildly different on the odd occasions I think 'oh hey, he's hot ^_^'.
5. I like non-canonical f/f and m/m pairings because I'm queer and the lack of queer representation in the media pisses me off and because I like to read about queer people, not because I want something to fap to.
no subject
2. Yeah but I'm talking about characters with explicit references to girlfriends/wives/that chick from last night I met in a bar oh dude she was so whack when I woke up. And the like. Where it's pretty much a given they are straight. If it's never stated one way or another well alright, fair game.
3. I think otherwise but I doubt we will agree on this point. I think they would never fall for someone outside their stated sexuality (unless it's for sweeps ratings bonuses LOL THIRTEEN lol House).
4. Well I'm straight and girls do nothing for me so eh, I think if it's a significant part of their character (their attitude towards the other gender) it can go OOC.
5. You seem to be one of the few so I can respect you want representation - most just seem to be all TWO DICKS SO HOT LOLZ and that's just.. come on 8|
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:43 (UTC) - ExpandThe Gay Agenda
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:48 (UTC) - ExpandSounds fab
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Gay Agenda
Re: The Gay Agenda
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Gay Agenda
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Gay Agenda
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 12:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 20:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 21:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)Also: if they are presented as straight in the show you cannot just assume OH THEY'RE BI TOO. No.
Well, yeah, you can. Because usually they're not portrayed as straight, they're portrayed as having an interest in the opposite sex. That means they can be either straight or bi, within canon. If it's never stated either way, both interpretations are valid.
Another question: do you also object to non-canon shipping? say, one character has a relationship with another character within the context of a show or book or movie, whatever. Do you think that shipping them with another character, whom canonically they never were shown as attracted to and/or interested in having a relationship with, is also 'OOC nonsense'? or do you just apply that judgement to sexuality?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 22:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 00:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
OH GOD NO, NOT ~DEFILING THE STRAIGHT CHARACTERS. Cos straight isn't the default, media isn't homophobic, and sexuality is TOTALLY SET AND FLUID and if you ever end up hooking up with one single person of the opposite sex it means you are STRAIGHT FOREVERS and that will never, ever change, and it is totally impossible to fall for someone of the same sex. Ever.
(Trufax: I am someone who used to only be interested in guys. I am kind of completely in love / wanna spend my whole life / etc. with a girl. DID I TAKE MYSELF OUT OF CHARACTER?! I NEED TO KNOW THIS. OMG. AM I OOC?!)
Also, serious lulz at the idea that anyone only writes m/m or f/f involving characters "shown to be straight" (read: "not explicitly defined within the show/movie/book canon to not be straight because, shockgasp, media in general tends to be really homophobic and straight is the default") because they wanna fap to it. Dude(tte), I don't even write porn. I don't read it. I don't look at it or watch it. I enjoy relationships and dynamics and, yes, romance between characters who are not paired together in the canon! Some of them may even have had canonical romantic interests that imply they are straight/bi/pan/etc.! I really could not give one single fuck.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Numbered lists keep me from exploding.
Re: Numbered lists keep me from exploding.
Re: Numbered lists keep me from exploding.
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 12:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Numbered lists keep me from exploding.
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 14:53 (UTC) - ExpandOkay, no.
Re: Numbered lists keep me from exploding.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 01:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 04:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 01:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-23 23:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 01:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-10-24 01:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)some days i feel embarrassed for this community
how do you guys live with yourselves, responding to this troll as if its serious?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-10-23 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Go revel in your canon. Oh, and don't tell people downthread that you don't care what they write, because you clearly do, or you wouldn't have offered up your opinion, unsolicited, on this secret. :-)
no subject
(no subject)